Subj : Re: EU rejects claims of To : RUG RAT From : Mike Powell Date : Mon Sep 01 2025 10:51:16 > ** On a side note. If you are taking unsolicited photos / videos for a blog / > vlog etc, and that post or video is monetized, does that cross the line into > needing a photo/video release? That would be a good debate topic I would say "yes" so as, at the very least, to cover your own arse. If they find out your making $$$ on it they will likely want some of the profit. That said, several years ago I too several photos and a couple of the locations (one a lighthouse and another a lake cruise) reached out and asked if they could use them to promote their locations. I said yes even though I am not getting paid. > MP> So if they do something bad, and you just tell what they did without > MP> opinion, it could be defamation? Consider the state of things right now, > MP> I > MP> am surprised we don't have one like this. > If you say it to them and only them, you are in the clear (Though being Korea, > I am sure there are other laws they can get you on.). Though with or without > oppinion if you saw something to a third party that "defames" them, you might > want a lawyer on retainer. That is not good, and sounds unfortunately like something our federal government might be interested in to silence dissent. :( > Other part of Korean law that comes into play with some of these (Though more > and more laws are doing away with this...)... > If the accused enteres into an agreement called a "Personal Appology > Settlement." Which usually includes an appology without admitting guilt and a > payment. The "agreived" will drop the charges or the prosecutor will decide > not to procede with prosecution.. On one hand it saves the court a lot of > time, but on the other hand opend the door for legalized extortion. Yeah, sounds like a field day for the legal profession. Mike * SLMR 2.1a * Psychoceramics: The study of crackpots. --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105) .