Aucb.559 fa.editor-p utcsrgv!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!C70:editor-people Mon Mar 1 14:36:31 1982 Re: Concurrent File Access >From Craig.Everhart@CMU-10A Mon Mar 1 11:07:33 1982 I see no reason why an editor should by default allow an edit session to proceed with the file-being-edited unlocked, certainly not after the user makes the first change to his image of the file. How this is integrated into the user interface is largely a matter of taste; however, it's highly annoying to have made lots of changes to a file only to find that they really weren't being made to the file at all, because you couldn't write them back out without clobbering something unknown. Better to find out that someone else is editing the same file either as you start looking at it or as you make your first change. The situation is reminiscent of a circa-1975 feature of CMU's mail sender; it would let you type in an arbitrarily-long message, then once you had finished it would notice that you had mis-typed your recipient's name, so it wouldn't send the mail. I think it didn't save a copy of what you had typed, either. ----------------------------------------------------------------- gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen of http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/ This Usenet Oldnews Archive article may be copied and distributed freely, provided: 1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles. 2. The following notice remains appended to each copy: The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996 Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.