From: sorincosofret@pleistoros.com Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 20:50 To: Anders Damsgaard Subject: FAKING THE SCIENCE FOR PUPILS - PART III FAKING THE SCIENCE FOR PUPILS - PART III I would like to mention from start that this newsletter is not discussing about black holes and the 2020 noble prize in physics! I cannot spoil the party and deny to these laureates a bit of fame they are craving for long time, so this topic is postponed for the following newsletter. Anyway, after solving the enigma of gravitational waves faked signal, now it is high time to speak about 2019 nobel prize in physics. Consequently, this newsletter has some sections dedicated to Mr. Peebles, although I do not think he deserves so much! Maybe someone would like to help me finding one of his original contribution to the modern science because I found none! I would like to advise the nobel committee that prizing imbecility is fun, but they should pay also some speech writers for helping the laureates to deliver some more consistent and nicer presentations during the festivities. In case of Mr. Peebles, it was painful to see a nobel laureate who has achieved nothing in science and the only relevant information from his presentation were some photo with other nobel laureates or how he reinvented the wheel. Coming back to more serious things, the present newsletter is still insisting on thermodynamic topics because this fake branch of science has brought humanity on the dangerous slope of autodestruction and for any common sense mind this has to be the starting point of any renaissance. Section one presents an experiment advanced by me about a decade ago and performed by a team from Museum Geneve. They used an old Watt engine to be powered by compressed air instead of steam, and the engine is producing mechanical work in absence of any source of heat. This is going to remain one of the most representative experiment in the XXI century science because it rules out the entire thermodynamic science with zero costs for the experiment. My old article with some grammatical correction is added to the newsletter too and one can make a comparison with the original article kept on the website. The second section is about early atmospheric steam engines and there, it is demonstrated in a simple but elegant manner how an entire class of steam engines, the so called atmospheric steam engines, are ruling out again the entire imbecility of second law of thermodynamics and of course the rest of modern thermodynamics. For close to a century, the so called atmospheric steam engines were the only available type of steam engines used in producing mechanical work. Although the idea of the first piston engine conceived by Denis Papin before 1690 was sound, the performances of his first model were not suitable for implementation in production. Yet, some improvements, increased dramatically the performance of this engine. The first improvements regards the separation of boiler from engine and the internal condensation of steam. These invention have been fraudulently attributed to Thomas Newcomen. As described in a previous newsletter (the process of information faking part I), Denis Papin was killed and his documents stolen in order to have the plans for his latest steam engine. It is going to be a further detective work to uncover (if possible!) how Thomas Newcomen got the plans for this advanced steam engine and the implication of Isaac Newton and his acolytes in these events. Other relevant invention was made much later by James Watt, who separate the condensation of steam from the cylinder engine. A detailed discussion about the atmospheric steam engines is provided because it is high time to refurbish and put them at work again! There are many technological processes in a lot of industries where steam is usually a byproduct and it is condensed to liquid with heat release into atmosphere, without any gain... The third section analysis how the steam from a common power plant (coal, petrol, nuclear) can be used for generating another surplus of electric energy by using the condensation of steam effect to produce mechanical work. Here it is very important to be underlined that mechanical work is generated by the fact that steam is condensed and the atmospheric pressure is in fact generating the work in order to compensate the variation of pressure in the cylinder. The heat of condensation or the heat of evaporation is going to be used as a tool in establishing the relationship between heat and mechanical work. For a pupil understanding things are very simple; not so simple for some theoreticians in the field, though! Assuming that 1 mole of water and one mole of acetone are either vaporized or condensed, the heat consumed or recovered is much different, but the variation of volume is quite the same. The molar heat of vaporization for water is 40.7 kJ/mol, but for acetone this is 31.0 kJ/mol. By evaporating a mole of water and a mole of acetone the variation of volume is quite the same. In gaseous state, a mole of any substance occupies a volume of 22,4 litres. Of course this volume is considered for ideal conditions and real conditions are a bit different from the ideal one. By taking in consideration the departure from ideal conditions for water and acetone, and by taking in consideration the fact that in liquid state the volume occupied by one mole of each substance is a bit different, there is a flagrant discrepancy between the mechanical effect generated by one mole of each substance and the heat of evaporation or condensation of these substances. In a laymen words, the consume for vaporization of a water mole needs about one third more energy as for acetone, but the mechanical work generated is quite the same. The same thing happen in condensation. By condensing a mole of water more heat is recovered as for acetone, but the amount of mechanical work is quite the same. This line of research like many others, has to wait until some imbeciles having key position in science die and they are replaced by some new intelligent ones. If the process is going to continue as in present days (imbeciles replacing other imbeciles), then the humanity is condemned to wait longer..... The forth section shows how to put at work the nuclear garbage produced by present day nuclear reactors. When fuel rods in a nuclear reactor are no longer usable because the heat released is less than optimal heat for the reactor needs, they are removed from the reactor core and replaced with fresh fuel rods. The spent fuel rods are still highly radioactive and continue to generate significant heat for decades. The fuel assemblies, which consist of dozens to hundreds of fuel rods each, are moved to pools of water to cool. This newsletter advocates that such garbage as far it is still producing thermal energy can be used for producing electrical energy. Well, instead of storing these spent fuel material in water, a better solution is to store them in chloroform or another convenient freon with a lower boiling point and a lower heat of vaporization. Instead of consuming energy to remove the heat from the spent nuclear material, in this new design the heat is used to boil the chloroform which further is used to produce mechanical work. The fifth section demonstrates the imbecility of mass energy conversion formula based on some nuclear reactions. In fact, for a laymen understanding the nuclear physicists have to turn back to the drawing board because entire particles (electrons) are missing in case of both alpha and beta decay reactions. These theoreticians have to learn how to write a chemical or nuclear reaction first and after that they can discuss about thermal effects. A new postulate is exemplified here too. Postulate: Mass and energy are completely different physical units. The sixth section presents the first nuclear incident in the Universe, which took place immediately after the Big Bang, i.e. the deuterium bottle neck. This is a parody to the imbecility of Big Bang theory and in the same time a special dedication to Mr. Jim Peebles - the 2019 nobel laureate for his contribution to cosmology, mainly Big Bang theory and other smaller imbecilities. The seventh section is about nuclear stability and an introduction to nuclear reactions. It is a parody to the boys farm for whom a special units was introduced in physics, i.e. the barn. The section demonstrates for a boy farm understanding that things are out of control and another path has to be find for the future. The eighth section describes a new effect and only its title is going to scare the GR fanatics, because it describes static and dynamic time delay in GR. A new postulate is presented and exemplified here: Postulate: Any change in space metric affects the measured distances and the temporal order of the events in that region of space. The ninth section dedicated to Mr. Peebles, analyses his remarkable presentation at the nobel prize gala. The last section is a copy carbon from the previous newsletter (Old game, same scene, new actors and figureheads ….), because it is important for people to get in touch with the expected unexpected... The link to this newsletter: https://www.pleistoros.com/en/newsletters Sincerely, Sorin Cezar Coșofreț