Subj : HTML?
To : Scott Little
From : Martin Prieto
Date : Fri Oct 06 2000 02:02 pm
SL> 256 bits for HTML eh? Who's HTML? What version? Well, I would say it'd
SL> be much closer to 1000 bits for a properly formatted HTML document,
SL> PLUS the HTTP overhead "to transmit the word 'attack' to an army"
Lemme try:
attack
It works great with Netscape and Lynx. No need for fancy Java,
Flash or buggy ActiveX. Just the straigh and crude words. This does 32
bytes or 256 bits. :)
Since the w3c is great they make HTML backward compatible.
If you really insit in formating it:
attack
which does 49 bytes (392 bits). You can also add paragraph heading
with and
so just add 5 bytes.
As for e-mail I can't help. But *I THINK* that there's a far bigger
header than html (wich does look like HTML does'nt it?).
(o_ UIN: 349 806 21 _o)
//\ Voice: MARTIN GET YOUR ASS IN HERE!! /\\
V_/_ e-mail: riverdale@penguinpowered.com _\_V
.... Beat me, whip me, but don't make me read my mail online!
--- RG Y2Ka2 / GE 1.20
* Origin: Mysteria BBS, Mtl (514)257-8043/mysteria.dynip.com (1:167/700)
.