Subj : HTML? To : Martin Prieto From : Scott Little Date : Tue Nov 14 2000 06:53 am [ 06 Oct 00 21:02, Martin Prieto wrote to Scott Little ] MP> Lemme try: MP> attack MP> Since the w3c is great they make HTML backward compatible. Funny you should mention W3C, beacuse their validator says your HTML is no good: -[snip]- Below are the results of attempting to parse this document with an SGML parser. Line 1, column 1: attack ^ Error: Missing DOCTYPE declaration at start of document (explanation...) Line 1, column 11: attack ^ Error: document type does not allow element "BODY" here Line 1, column 31: attack ^ Error: end tag for "HTML" which is not finished Sorry, this document does not validate as HTML 4.01 Transitional. -[snip]- In short: your HTML is invalid - try again. MP> As for e-mail I can't help. But *I THINK* that there's a far MP> bigger header than html (wich does look like HTML does'nt it?). The header of an email involves some of the data required to get from A to B, like the sender and recipient names. This info is not present in the other formats as presented. Apples and oranges. -- Scott Little, 3:712/848@fidonet | slittle@slittle.com --- FMail/Win32 1.48b+ * Origin: Cyberia: You know you want it. [02-9596-0284] (3:712/848) .