Subj : Re: Google's Go language
To   : art
From : Deavmi
Date : Fri Aug 04 2017 22:45:00

On 2011-09-27 06:45 PM, art wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
>   > My answer wasn't meant to be specific..  Honestly I don't know what people a
>   > using it for, but I don't think it was designed for only one use.  Similar t
>   > how C++ is a general-purpose language, I thought Google's Go was also meant
>   > a general-purpose language.
> 
> Google Go is good for concurrent processing (note: not the same as parallel).
> I've been taking a very brief look at it recently, and it seems to be a pretty
> nice language.
> 
> It compiles, so it's much faster than an interpreter. Recent improvements
> include much better Windows platform support this year.
> 
> Plus, with that awesome logo... why wouldn't you use it? :)
> 
> On the serious side, I'll probably look into trying Go for a network server
> program when I have some spare time, and see how it fares.
> 
> Regards,
>   ________________ _______
>   \_____       __ \    ___\
>    \   __  \      <_   \     @ fatcats[dot]poorcoding[dot]com
>     \_______\___\___\___\  ------------------------------------
>                                  f a t c a t s      b b s
> 
> ---
>   ¨ Synchronet ¨ fatcats bbs - http://fatcats.poorcoding.com
> 
No OOP though or atleast through classes. They do some struct stuff 
don't they.

---
 ­ Synchronet ­ KK4QBN + (706)-422-9538 + kk4qbn.synchro.net + 24/7/365

.