Subj : false indentities.. To : Rob Mccart From : August Abolins Date : Sun Jan 29 2023 12:42:00 Hello Rob! RM> I actually ran across some info on it since posting this RM> and it's not quite as easy as it sounds, the 'sellers' RM> have to do an actual identity theft to pull it off, having RM> drivers license numbers and Social Insurance numbers and RM> such, but we know these things still happen fairly RM> frequently. Apparently we do not exist unless some flimsy document says so. I know people who have lost their IDs, and the banks they have always patronized don't even allow them to access their money even though the tellers KNOW the person! Apparently the only way you can prove who you are is with a piece of paper. RM> They mentioned on the news that it is run most often by RM> organized crime. Something like 30 homes in Toronto alone RM> have been subject to this in the past year, mostly RM> Mortgage fraud, not the sale of the house fraud, which is RM> much harder to pull off. Right.. sounds like a bunch of "fake" lawyers are in on the act and maybe even a banking insider is involved. RM> A story mentioned that in 4 cases the house was actually RM> sold, and one couple only found out about it because their RM> mortgage had been paid off - which would have to be done RM> before the house could be sold. (They were out of the RM> country for 4 years with the house rented out.) Yes.. CBC radio elaborated a bit more about that case too. Incredible to learn that your own house has been sold fraudulently like that. RM> It was mentioned that 'the system' believes the new owners RM> legally own the property but there's no further info on RM> what can be done to get it back. It's apparently a little RM> messier than buying a stolen car.. It's probably the same process to return the property to the rightful owner but the players (the bank, the lawyers, etc) are reluctant because a house/property is usually a bigger ticket item ( 6 $ figures) as opposed to a car (5 $ figures), and those players don't want to take the losses - although THEY are the very parties that let it happen in the first place. RM> Everyone believes something should be done to prevent this RM> but it's one of those things where it will take time for RM> the law to catch up with the crime.. and I think That is RM> ridiculous too.. They should be able to pass something RM> virtually overnight to stop this. I'd imagine just making RM> the lawyer that put through the sale financially RM> responsible for the whole mess might put a stop to it RM> pretty quickly.. Yes.. I don't see why extra checks and balances can't be implemented immediately. For starters, if I were the bank or deed office facilitating the transfer, I'd question the legitimacy of the lawyers participating and any documents presented. Eg. If the fraudsters were of a visible ethnic background, and the legit owners were something else, then that could be a red- flag. I am a victim of a fraudulent property transfer myself, and *I* wasn't even informed by the deeds office or by the participating lawyer that it was taking place. -- ../|ug --- OpenXP 5.0.57 * Origin: Stare into this point intently ->.<- (1:153/757.21) .