Subj : Re: Chinese Scientists Cr To : KURT WEISKE From : Mike Powell Date : Tue Feb 25 2025 10:37:00 > AT> Ok, correction: he assaulted a woman in midtown Manhattan in July of > AT> 2022, posted bail, assaulted the female police officer on August 9 of > AT> 2024, was granted bail on October 17 of 2024, then on February 15 of > AT> this year he assaulted another woman in Times Square. > Thank you for citing this one isolated incident that supports your claim. Here is a better one. If you google "usa likelihood violent offenders repeat," the first non-AI response you will get is from the United States Sentencing Commission. They say that "63.8% of violent offenders recidivated by being rearrested for a new crime or for a violation of supervision conditions." They also note that this is a higher rate than for non-violent offenders. I am sure that a few of them are committing new acts of violence while in custody, but it sounds like a high percentage of them (nearly 2/3rds) are in trouble again within ~8 years and I am guessing most of that nearly 2/3rds are ones who were released. Note that this percentage is only for *federal* violent offenders. Another link that shows up is from the NIH and was published in 2013. It claims that 1% of the population accounts for 63.2% of all convictions. It potes that "the majority of violent crimes are perpetrated by a small number of *persistent* violent offenders." Persistent being a key word. The NIH goes on to say that this group of persistent offender is typically male and usually have a pattern of early-onset violent offenses, substance abuse, personality disorders, and also a history of non-violent offenses. I mention the year in this last one as proof that it didn't come out in the last 6 weeks. Another important note is that, for whatever reason, the US NIH was studying *Swedish* violent criminals and not US criminals. (???) Back to the good ole USA and CNN has an article whose headline seems to contradict the US Sentencing Commission data. They claim that violent criminals are rarely rearrested "for the same offense." That last bit may be key. * SLMR 2.1a * A reasonable man accomplishes nothing. --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105) .