Subj : Left wing Nanny State
To   : ALL
From : BOB KLAHN
Date : Sat May 25 2013 01:47:26


BK>>Yet he claims the authority to decide the fate of the child
BK>>before birth.

 TR> Note Klahn's attempt to `switch sides' here; pretending
 TR> that suggesting a woman use a method of birth control ( ie:
 TR> condom...intra-uteran device...diaphram...daily birth
 TR> control pill...etc etc), instead of resorting to abortion,
 TR> is "...claims the authority to decide the fate of the child
 TR> before birth".!,

 Since an abortion doesn't take place unless a woman is pregnant, all his
 rants about birth control are just smoke.

 TR> and deliberately ignoring that making the
 TR> decision to ABORT an UNBORN CHILD is *DECIDING THE FATE* of
 TR> a child before birth..which decision the taxpayers had no
 TR> input on.

 Again, he ignores the fact that I am a pro-life Catholic, so I never
 ignore abortion. What I do say is, if he will let the child die after it
 is born, or even suffer hunger and desperation, he has no say in whether
 or not the child should be born.

 TR> What a ridiculous notion! The four hundred pound gorilla in
 TR> the room is the question: Where does her *responsibility
 TR> for her own actions* begin, and why do the taxpayer's have
 TR> to shoulder *financial responsibility*

 Where do the taxpayers get the standing to tell her she can't have an
 abortion yet let the child suffer or die for lack of ability to provide
 for the child?

 TR> for her lack of emotional self-control? Is there NO
 TR> responsibility for this to be laid on her?

 Responsibility is not the question. Life or death is the question.
 Richardson's punitive position on pregnancy gives the woman even more
 reason to abort.




BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

--- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)

.