Subj : Re: Proposal to Keep WinXP Support "Alive"
To   : All
From : keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net
Date : Thu Jan 31 2019 19:14:19

Path:
eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.PO
STED!not-for-mail
From: knuttle <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.windows-xp,alt.os.windows-xp,microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment,mi
crosoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Subject: Re: Proposal to Keep WinXP Support "Alive"
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 08:56:53 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <kb72j5$1i8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <m36sc8dpovqpibrtvmcd7pvdq2kpu3m5i6@4ax.com>
<XnsA12C3B284ED20jj@88.198.244.100>
<669769ce-c1a1-4f17-90f0-68768fc8dab6@f4g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<kb38pt$h2i$1@dont-email.me> <e$DniHbm8Y1QFwST@soft255.demon.co.uk>
<kb4e3h$kna$1@dont-email.me> <aljbd8t6ijnslrc7i9n44nihuc69abei12@4ax.com>
<kb4vgl$tpj$1@dont-email.me> <YSn2pmx3Sv1QFwhA@soft255.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 13:56:53 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="941613918a673457b5b7dffa63b339ec";
 logging-data="1608"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+f/wVJPPzEzZqXVD9rcYc+"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
In-Reply-To: <YSn2pmx3Sv1QFwhA@soft255.demon.co.uk>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4VIjcE6vxXfXl8jxwCn+/RDylI8=
Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.windows-xp:4006 alt.os.windows-xp:5412
microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment:2462
microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support:30880
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:106104

On 12/23/2012 7:10 AM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
> In message <kb4vgl$tpj$1@dont-email.me>, knuttle

>>> <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>> I am not against new things in the operating system. In fact I was
>> using
>> OS/2 when most people were extolling the virtue of the first version of
>> Windows. Why because it was far superior to Windows.
>
> In your opinion. (Which Windows are you talking about - 3.1 [or even
> earlier], or the '9x series [95/98/Me]?)
>>
>> I gladly upgraded to XP as it was based on part of the code that made
>> OS/2 far superior and stable.
>
> So you accepted the new when it meant it wasn't new to you (-:.

I have worked with FORTRAN, COBOL, BASIC, DOS, WINDOWS and OS/2
My first programmable device was a TI-59 calculator. My first computer 
was a TI-99/4a, my next was an Apple II? (1983).  The first PC operating 
system I used was DOS.  I then got the first Window OS when it replaced 
DOS 6.  After using it for a period I bought OS/2 and installed it.

I definitely am not afraid of new things.

While you are criticizing me for what I said, you never answered the 
ergonomic problems I have with Windows 8
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
 * Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx  //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)

.