Subj : Re: Proposal to Keep WinXP Support "Alive" To : All From : none@none.invalid Date : Thu Jan 31 2019 19:14:19 Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!fee der.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easyn ews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-ma il From: Char Jackson Newsgroups: alt.windows-xp,alt.os.windows-xp,microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment,mi crosoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general Subject: Re: Proposal to Keep WinXP Support "Alive" Message-ID: <38kpd85lqtnfl1uk0mmj0rukrirujn414n@4ax.com> References: <669769ce-c1a1-4f17-90f0-68768fc8dab6@f4g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 32 X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy! X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly. Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 16:55:00 -0600 X-Received-Bytes: 2620 Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.windows-xp:4021 alt.os.windows-xp:5429 microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment:2471 microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support:30900 microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:106182 On Sat, 22 Dec 2012 13:52:05 -0500, knuttle wrote: >On 12/22/2012 10:17 AM, Char Jackson wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Dec 2012 08:54:56 -0500, knuttle >> wrote: >> >>> I am not against new things in the operating system. In fact I was using >>> OS/2 when most people were extolling the virtue of the first version of >>> Windows. Why because it was far superior to Windows. >>> >>> I gladly upgraded to XP as it was based on part of the code that made >>> OS/2 far superior and stable. >>> >>> However, why should I get excited about upgrading to a system that >>> assumes I am using a touch screen on my computer? >> >> That explains a lot about your attitude. You seem to have completely >> ignored the multiple mentions of being able to avoid the modern UI and >> using a standard desktop. >> > >Blinded by your opinion, you missed the hole point of what I wrote I was specifically responding to your final paragraph and only left the rest in for context. If your "hole point" (sic) wasn't captured by that paragraph, then I indeed missed it. In case I need to spell it out, Win 8 *doesn't* assume that you're using a touch screen, at least not in the way that I think you mean it. --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1 * Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013) .