Subj : another form of quoting
To   : Martin Foster
From : August Abolins
Date : Mon Jan 18 2021 14:20:00

On 1/17/2021 3:52 AM, between "Martin Foster - August Abolins":

MF wrote:
========
>  AK>> So I clarify how I did it: 1. You use Reformator as usual and
>  AK>> make
> .1.
>  AA> quoting for the message, you can add your text. All the quotes will
>  AA> consists of short lines. 2. You press "Unform. sel text" and you get
>  AA> the message with all lines flowed (one line paragraps). It is not
>  AA> necessary to select the text lines if you do operation for all the
>  AA> text. Don't forget that paragraphs should be separated by a empty
>  AA> line.
> .2.
>  AA> I just tried it. Seems to be a fine solution.
>
>  AA> We don't really need initials on every line.


MF wrote:
========
> I beg to differ :)
>
> The quoted lines between ".1." and ".2." appear to have been written by "AA"(you) when, in fact, they were written by "AK"(Alexander).

There are other ways to quote, which can be utilized.  See above.

But personally, I would venture to write a reply with the least amount of quoting if possible.

MF wrote:
========
>  AA> The above "AK>" should look pretty good on my much smaller Blackberry.
>
> Fine but the lack of quote characters/initials makes it quite difficult to follow a conversation when using the likes of GoldED+ et al.

I'll show you another way.  But I'll dig up the original message from Dec 1.

--- 
 * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)

.