Subj : RE:follow-up on: NCs who've updated to MakeNl_NG To : Andrew Leary From : Marc Lewis Date : Fri Jan 25 2013 07:43:14 Hello Andrew. ML> I'm in much the same position as an RC. If I don't happen to receive ML> a weekly update from an NC, I have to presume the previous segment ML> from that system is correct and valid... within limits of course. AL> I am working on raising that age limit now. Would the 7 weeks that AL> NLMake uses be sufficient for your purposes? I am also looking AL> into the problem you reported with the OS/2 32-bit version, but AL> that may take some time to track down. The program has no business whatsoever omitting data because of age. Absolutely unacceptable. And the version of NLMake I've been using has no problem with the age of files in the Master directory. The only thing the program should look at is the most recent file and disregard the rest. Best regards, Marc --- timEd/2 1.10.y2k+ * Origin: Sursum Corda! BBS-Huntsville,AL-bbs.sursum-corda.com (1:396/45) .