Subj : follow-up on: NCs who've updated to MakeNl_NG
To   : Andrew Leary
From : Bob Seaborn
Date : Fri Jan 25 2013 09:30:00

 >
 >ML> I'm in much the same position as an RC.  If I don't happen to receive
 >ML> a weekly update from an NC, I have to presume the previous segment
 >ML> from that system is correct and valid... within limits of course.
 >
 > I am working on raising that age limit now.  Would the 7 weeks that
 > NLMake uses be sufficient for your purposes?    I am also looking into

      Why not make it 51 weeks, or better yet, make the limit fully optional?
That makes more sense to me.



 > the problem you reported with the OS/2 32-bit version, but that may take
 > some time to track down.


      And (supposedly) the DOS 16bit version.


      Thank you.





                       .....Bob

--- GEcho/32 & IM 2.50
 * Origin: http://www.fidonet.ca (1:140/12)

.