Subj : RE:follow-up on: NCs who've updated to MakeNl_NG
To   : Marc Lewis
From : Janis Kracht
Date : Fri Jan 25 2013 09:29:46

Hi Marc,

> <On 24Jan2013 05:52 Andrew Leary (1:320/119) wrote a message to Marc Lewis
> regarding follow-up on: NCs who've updated to MakeNl_NG >

>> I'm in much the same position as an RC.  If I don't happen to receive
>> a weekly update from an NC, I have to presume the previous segment
>> from that system is correct and valid... within limits of course.

>> I am working on raising that age limit now.  Would the 7 weeks that
>> NLMake uses be sufficient for your purposes?    I am also looking
>> into the problem you reported with the OS/2 32-bit version, but
>> that may take some time to track down.

>The program has no business whatsoever omitting data because of age. Absolutel
> unacceptable.

I agree... nothing should be removed by MakeNl.

>And the version of NLMake I've been using has no problem with
> the age of files in the Master directory.  The only thing the program should
> look at is the most recent file and disregard the rest.

Agree here as well.

Take care,
Janis

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)

.