Subj : Makenl and bad segments...
To   : Bj”rn Felten
From : Joe Delahaye
Date : Sun Jan 04 2015 12:39:09

  Re: Makenl and bad segments...
  By: Bj”rn Felten to Joe Delahaye on Sat Jan 03 2015 17:48:37

 WD>>> * If something is being done all over zone-2 then it is relevant

 JD>> It is still ONLY Z2 and not the other 3 zones.

 BF> Irrelevant. What's relevant is that it's actually something that can be
 BF> put into a technical definition file.

Why.  The FTSC documents general practice.  If it is only done in one zone, it
is not general practice.  


 BF> As I said before, if Ward had put it into writing and submitted it to
 BF> the FTSC, it would have been judged by it's merits. Not that I think it
 BF> would have any real value to add to our FTN -- but at least he could have
 BF> given it a try. We've seen far more queer proposals during the decades...
 BF> 8-)

Perhaps, but again, General practice, is what is supposed to be looked at.  The
fact that several stupid things were done previously does not mean that
something that might make a little more sense, should be accepted, just
because.
--- SBBSecho 2.27-Win32
 * Origin: The Lions Den BBS, Trenton, On, CDN (1:249/303)

.