Subj : Next Release of MakeNL
To   : Andrew Leary
From : Kees van Eeten
Date : Thu Nov 03 2016 22:30:02

Hello Andrew!

03 Nov 16 17:19, you wrote to me:

 KE>>  I have had a "look" at 3.4.6, not tested it jet. What I gathered from
 KE>> the docomentation and the source code, is that a BOM from submitted
 KE>> fts5 lines will be removed, but the copyright, prolog and epilog are
 KE>> untouched. Shouldn't the BOM be removed from these files as well?

 AL> Good point.  I'll have to add scanning for BOMs in those files as well.

 KE>>  I will run a nodelist production on a test system tonight.

 AL> Let me know how it goes.

 I tried it with my Nodelist rebuild routine, it runs makenl with a proper
 ctl for every node in the nodelist and ends with the distribution file.

 There were no problems there. The REMoveBOM flag was enabled, but ofcourse
 there were no BOM's in the input files. I will leave the creation of files
 with BOM markers to Michiel. He uses a MS-editor, that adds such usefull
 information.

 I will have to modify my currents scripts that prepare the makenl input for
 the generation of the UTF nodelist, as these script do, what is now in makenl.

 If everything remains well on the test system, I will use 3.4.6 for the
 shadow production of the Z2 nodelist production as well.

Kees

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
 * Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)

.