Subj : Nodes without binkp in nodelist entry?
To   : poindexter FORTRAN
From : Digital Man
Date : Wed Jun 16 2021 17:41:51

  Re: Nodes without binkp in nodelist entry?
  By: poindexter FORTRAN to DaiTengu on Mon Jun 14 2021 06:05 pm

 > Subject: Nodes without binkp in nodelist entry?
 > @MSGID: <60C7FCF2.61039.dove.sync@realitycheckbbs.org>
 > @REPLY: <60C7EF4F.50770.dove-syncdisc@warensemble.com>
 > @TZ: c1e0
 >   Re: Nodes without binkp in nodelist entry?
 >   By: DaiTengu to poindexter FORTRAN on Mon Jun 14 2021 07:07 pm
 >
 > Da> If there's no binkd response, and there's no binkd flag, then the
 > Da> nodelist is not in error. Ideally BinkIT wouldn't try calling it, since
 > Da> it's not flying the appropriate flag. If you're trying to send netmail
 > Da> to the node, I'd suggest routing it through his NC.
 >
 > There is a binkd response, but no binkd flag in the nodelist. What's
 > puzzling is that without a bink flag, binkit is trying to connect. Based on
 > the "undefined" part of the connect string and selecting port 0, it seems
 > like something's off.

I agree: any appearance of "undefined" in JavaScript modules/utilities is highly suspect of a bug.
-- 
                                            digital man

Synchronet "Real Fact" #83:
Donations to the Synchronet project are welcome at wiki.synchro.net/donate
Norco, CA WX: 84.9øF, 45.0% humidity, 9 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
 * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)

.