Subj : kermit protocol in syncterm To : Christian Sacks From : Digital Man Date : Mon Aug 14 2023 11:41:25 Re: kermit protocol in syncterm By: Christian Sacks to All on Mon Aug 14 2023 11:47 am > Hey y'all, > > Just wanted to post it here as don't know where else would be better, I > managed to get the kermit protocol running in Mystic (I know this isn't a > mystic channel) and really would love it if syncterm could handle the kermit > protocol. > > Is there any way in it's current form there's an ability to use like an > external protocol with syncterm? or if not, what are the chances kermit > could get added to a future release of syncterm? > > After using it for a little while with qodem, I realise that the transfer > speeds in kermit are a lot, and I mean a LOT faster than zmodem for example, > and think we could all benefit from having that as an option on BBSes that > support kermit. > > Just my thoughts for the day, lemme know if you think it's a good idea or > not, and if there's a way for me to use kermit currently with syncterm. > > Thanks for listening =) The place to make SyncTERM feature requests is here: https://sourceforge.net/p/syncterm/feature-requests/ Most likely, any *significant* performance differences you're observing between Kermit and ZMODEM would be in the protocol driver/implementation (e.g. in Qodem) and not the protocol itself. The ZMODEM protocol also has a lot of options that can impact through-put (e.g. windowing or not, window size, encoding/escaping of characters). If you want the lowest overhead protocol, use YMODEM-G. It doesn't have all the same features of ZMODEM (or Kermit), but has the lowest amount of protocol overhead of all of them (besides plain TCP, e.g. FTP). -- digital man (rob) Sling Blade quote #24: Karl: Kaiser blade. I hit my mother upside the head with it. Mmm... Killed her. Norco, CA WX: 82.0øF, 60.0% humidity, 3 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705) .