Subj : Re: Re-processing QWK packets
To   : poindexter FORTRAN
From : Digital Man
Date : Sun Jan 28 2024 13:03:00

  Re: Re: Re-processing QWK packets
  By: poindexter FORTRAN to Digital Man on Sun Jan 28 2024 10:10 am

 > Subject: Re: Re-processing QWK packets
 > @MSGID: <65B69CDA.67312.dove.sync@realitycheckbbs.org>
 > @REPLY: <65B58381.51120.sync@vert.synchro.net>
 > @TZ: 41e0
 > -=> Digital Man wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
 >
 >
 >  DM> Yes, just renaming the file to VERT.QWK should trigger an import
 >  DM> attempt (in the terminal server event thread).
 >
 > Thanks, I saw this when I tried re-importing:
 >
 > 1/28  09:54:31a  QNET !Message from VERT on UNKNOWN QWK CONFERENCE
 > NUMBER: 2022
 >
 > 1/28  09:54:31a  QNET C:\sbbs\data\VERT.qwk renamed to
 > C:\sbbs\data\VERT.qwk.65b694d7.bad
 >
 > (There were some other errors about duplicate messages as well)
 >
 > The weird thing was that when I added TECH_TALK to the BBS, I'd noticed
 > that my DOVE boards were set to dynamic numbers

That's correct. Only QWKnet *hubs* should enable static QWK conference numbering.

 > , and I have a message
 > area 2022 configured as TECH_TALK.
 >
 > I just tried deleting the area and re-creating it as a static QWK area #
 > 2022 and got the same error.

That conference number (2022) needs to be configured for a QWKhub in SCFG->Networks->QWK->Hubs->VERT->Sub-boards.
-- 
                                            digital man (rob)

Rush quote #46:
One day I feel I'm on top of the world, and the next it's falling in on me
Norco, CA WX: 79.4øF, 22.0% humidity, 3 mph S wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
 * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)

.