Subj : JS Object save_msg()
To   : Digital Man
From : deon
Date : Mon Dec 23 2024 07:20:00

  Re: JS Object save_msg()
  By: Digital Man to deon on Sat Dec 21 2024 04:59 pm

Howdy,

 > No, it doesn't. The JS when_written_time property is still a time_t
 > representation - I do the conversion (encoding upon assignemnt, decoding
 > upon use) to the SMB date storage automatically for you.

Actually I was refering to the post implementation of your changes to when_written_time - from your commit example:

Here's an example from smbutil v of a message header posted after this change:
  when_written     03292595 41E0 Fri Dec 20 18:22:21 2024 PST

0x03292595 (53028245) is the now new value of when_written_time right? and time() will return a number like 1734898576, which will always be less.

But I think I get you, when I read a when_written_time, it'll convert back to time_t value like time()?


....лоеп

---
 ю Synchronet ю AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSI
 * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)

.