Subj : Ukrainian Blitzkrieg explained
To   : Dan Clough
From : Lee Lofaso
Date : Fri Dec 30 2022 21:45:37

Hello Dan,

 BF>> Now, if only Sloppy Joe could abandon his standpoint that no
 BF>> western weapons should be able to reach more than 80km. Why not
 BF>> let Ukraine respond in kind to the missiles fired from much
 BF>> longer than that?

 DC> Ukraine is free to respond in any manner that they are able to.

Saddam Hussein also had that choice. We all saw how far that got him.

After the USA atomized Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Truman's generals
(including Curtis LeMay) wanted him to continue - by atomizing cities
in the USSR.

Why did President Truman refuse to go along with his own generals
advice? We all know Truman hated the color yellow, as shown by his
own actions. But white is the color of purity, and innocence.

Yes, Comrade Joe got a pass. But only because he was white.
Which explains why Mad Vlad will also get a pass ...

 DC> Why is it the USA's problem/obligation to provide them with the means to do
 DC> that?

You can thank the Rosenbergs.

 DC> Why don't some of you Euro-commie fucks give them what they need?

We already gave them everything they need, or could ever want.

 DC> It is *YOU*, after all, who are geographically close by and need
 DC> to keep the Russkies away.  Honestly I don't really give a fuck.

"The Russians are coming! The Russians are coming!"

I watched a movie of the same name. Laughed my head off. And then
somebody told me it was all fake news. Really spoiled my day.

 BF>> Missiles fired from the Black Sea Fleet? Well, even Sweden has
 BF>> naval anti-missiles that can handle that (designed to work
 BF>> against the Orcs in the Baltic Sea).

 DC> Okay, so let Sweden handle the situation and send the Bears home.

Sweden (and Finland) will soon be full-fledged members of NATO.
All for one, and one for all is their motto (Article V).

 BF>> C'mon now, Sloppy Joe, it's time to no longer cowardly
 BF>> clinging to the sideline and enter the fight. Putin is not as
 BF>> formidable as you think.

 DC> I'm certainly no fan of Joe, but fuck off and provide the support
 DC> yourself.  It's not our problem.

With Sweden joining NATO it will be our problem as well as theirs.
But then, it is already our own problem, as it is the entire world's
problem.

 DC> This whole post is a perfect example of your two-faced-ness.

Mad Vlad invaded a sovereign nation. Without provocation. Ukraine
responded in the only way it could - by resisting the aggressor with
force. What was the alternative? No more Ukraine, no more Ukrainians.
No more democracy. For anybody. In the whole world.

 DC> If the USA *did* get highly involved in this bullshit, *YOU* would be the
 DC> first to start screaming that we are trying to empire-build, and that we
 DC> have no business interfering, and we should keep out of it.... blah, blah,
 DC> blah.

What did US President Barack Obama do when Mad Vlad invaded Crimea,
illegally annexing the territory as part of Russia? Do you think he
just stood there, doing nothing? Remember, the Ukrainian army at
that time was basically non-existent. And what few there were had
little or no military training.

But then, in your world, imposing sanctions on Russia are meaningless.
Better to nuke them, as the USA has a huge stockpile of nukes that can
be launched straight toward the Kremlin. All Barack Obama had to do
was press the Big Red Button.

Of course, Mad Vlad would have done the same.

And we'd all have gone up in smoke. Just like Cheech and Chong.

 DC> Fuck all you commie-wannabes.

That explains why so many Cubans are seeking asylum - in Tijuana.

For Life,
Lee

-- 
Travel should take you places

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
 * Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

.