Subj : "Non-state actor intelligence service"
To   : All
From : warmfuzzy
Date : Wed Nov 15 2017 05:17:17

I was listening to the news yesterday and WikiLeaks was called a "non-state
actor intelligence service."  I'd never really considered the possibility of an
intelligence service apart from being attached to a country.  How far would one
go with that line of thinking?  Is Spooknet a non-state intelligence service? I
sure don't think so, but with people in power playing with words who knows?
Maybe someday this message network will be called a "clear and present danger."
It frustrates me how people who have a different opinion can call an apple an
orange, or something otherwise as ridiculous... does every system with a focus
on intelligence matters get labeled as a threat to security.  Its just absurd.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A35 (Linux/64)
 * Origin: PHATstar RetroBOX! (700:100/0)

.