00:00:00 --- log: started forth/02.04.25 00:48:42 --- join: gilbertbsd (~gilbert@max1-39.dacor.net) joined #forth 00:48:49 hello 01:10:01 --- quit: gilbertbsd ("xchat exiting..") 01:30:39 --- quit: MrGone (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 01:32:48 --- join: rob_ert (~robert@h237n2fls31o965.telia.com) joined #forth 01:43:33 --- join: davidw (~davidw@ppp-143-5.25-151.libero.it) joined #forth 06:02:07 --- join: herkamire (~jason@wsip68-15-54-54.ri.ri.cox.net) joined #forth 06:13:07 --- join: sif (~siforth@ip68-9-58-81.ri.ri.cox.net) joined #forth 06:13:07 Type sif: (or /msg sif to play in private) 06:13:20 sif: ." barcaro!" 06:13:21 hi 06:13:21 davidw: 06:13:29 sif: ' + 06:13:30 davidw: 06:13:33 sif: ' + .s 06:13:34 davidw: 25 06:13:40 sif: ' + 1+ execute 06:13:41 davidw: stack underflow 06:13:51 sif: 5 6 ' + 1+ execute 06:13:53 davidw: 06:13:55 execute doesn't work... ggrrr 06:13:58 sif: 5 6 ' + execute 06:13:59 davidw: 06:14:04 bummer 06:14:17 sif: 5 6 + execute 06:14:18 davidw: stack underflow 06:14:21 sif: 5 6 + 06:14:22 davidw: 06:14:27 sif: 5 6 + . 06:14:28 davidw: 11 06:14:40 sif: 12 ' + 1+ execute . 06:14:42 onetom: stack underflow 06:15:54 sif: 12 ' + 12 + execute . 06:15:56 onetom: 0 06:16:21 sif: : a 1000000 0 do I . loop ; a 06:16:22 davidw: Word not found: I 06:16:36 sif: : a 1000000 0 do loop ; a 06:16:37 davidw: 06:16:41 sif: 12 ' + 8 + execute . 06:16:43 onetom: stack underflow 06:16:48 sif: 12 ' + 8 - execute . 06:16:49 onetom: 12 stack underflow 06:17:37 see how it handles endless loops 06:18:02 sif: : a 1000000 0 do i . loop ; a 06:18:03 onetom: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 06:19:21 davidw: i know how 06:19:22 cat t.fs tmp2 | ./sif > tmp3 & 06:19:22 sleep 1 06:19:22 kill $! 2>/dev/null >/dev/null 06:19:36 aha 06:20:32 sif: : a 10 0 do ." Robert " loop ; a 06:20:33 rob_ert: Robert Robert Robert Robert Robert Robert Robert R 06:26:10 ok, I figured out what's wrong with execute. 06:26:23 now, if I can figure out what to do about it... 06:26:57 sif: 12 3 ' + execute . 06:26:59 onetom: 9 06:27:20 herkamire: is there anythin wrong w it? 06:27:24 it executes - in place of plus... 06:28:48 that I haven't figured out. and at compile time, it recurses until you run out of data stack 06:29:16 sif: 12 3 ' + .s 06:29:17 davidw: 12 3 25 06:29:29 sif: 12 3 ' + 1+ execute . 06:29:30 davidw: 36 06:29:42 sif: 12 3 ' + 1 execute . 06:29:43 davidw: 3 06:29:45 herkamire: oops u r right & im blind :) 06:29:53 sif: 12 3 1 execute . 06:29:54 davidw: 12 06:29:58 sif: 12 3 2 execute . 06:30:00 davidw: 650 06:30:03 sif: 12 3 3 execute . 06:30:04 davidw: 12 06:30:09 sif: 12 3 34343 execute . 06:30:10 davidw: 3 06:30:14 sif: 12 3 3434 execute . 06:30:15 davidw: 426 06:34:07 at interpret time it increments the xt then executes it... 06:34:44 if you compile it, I believe it executes everything on the datastack then gives a stack underflow error 06:40:10 : execute cell - >r ; 06:40:18 that works beautifully 06:40:38 I gotta get more of my builtins into forth... 06:43:21 sif: 1 2 ' + execute . 06:43:22 herkamire: 3 06:43:53 sif: : a ['] + 5 9 rot execute ; a .s 06:43:54 herkamire: 14 06:44:02 fixed! 08:00:21 4th: ." testing" 08:00:22 onetom: testing 08:01:41 4th: : x cr 1 . ; x x x x 08:01:42 onetom: 1 08:01:45 onetom: 1 08:01:45 onetom: 1 08:01:45 onetom: 1 08:02:00 hmm... looks a bit faster, doesnt it? 08:05:00 4th: : x 5 0 do cr i loop ; x 08:05:56 4th: : x cr 1 . ; x x x x 08:05:57 onetom: 1 08:05:58 onetom: 1 08:05:58 onetom: 1 08:05:58 onetom: 1 08:06:07 4th: : x cr 1 . ; x x x x 08:06:08 onetom: 1 08:06:10 onetom: 1 08:06:10 onetom: 1 08:06:10 onetom: 1 08:06:24 not baaad... not bad indeed 08:07:10 i made a s/putserv/putquick/ in the bot code 08:07:25 it will do ithink 08:07:42 4th: : x 5 0 do cr i . loop ; x 08:07:43 onetom: 0 08:07:45 onetom: 1 08:07:45 onetom: 2 08:07:45 onetom: 3 08:07:45 onetom: 4 08:07:52 4th: words 08:07:54 onetom: disasm disassembler base-addr show-name default-32bit default-16bit 08:07:55 onetom: default-16bit? col w@ (D.) MAXCOUNTED SPCS SPCS-MAX maxstring 08:07:55 onetom: end-code ;code (;code) code init-asm assembler print-backtrace 08:07:55 onetom: backtrace-return-stack init-backtrace backtrace-rs-buffer adjust-buffer 08:07:55 onetom: init-buffer buffer% buffer-maxlength buffer-address buffer-length 08:07:57 onetom: buffer-descriptor ekey? esc? ekey>char ekey clear-ekey-buffer 08:07:59 onetom: esc-sequence esc-prefix #esc ekey-buffered ekey-buffer esc-sequences 08:08:01 onetom: unkeys unkey char-append-buffer key-buffered key-buffer k12 k11 k10 08:08:03 onetom: k9 k8 k7 k6 k5 k4 k3 k2 k1 k-insert k-end k-home k-down k-up 08:09:14 ithink, its time 2 implement /msg so the bot wont fill up the logs while just testing it 08:16:38 melle 08:18:26 4th: ." dumptest" 08:19:21 4th: ." dumptest" 08:19:22 onetom: dumptest 08:42:17 --- join: tathi (~tathi@wsip68-15-54-54.ri.ri.cox.net) joined #forth 09:25:23 4th: : panic 1000 0 do 65 emit loop ; panic 09:25:24 herkamire: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 09:26:03 4th: : panic 510 0 do 65 emit loop ; panic 09:26:05 herkamire: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 09:26:26 4th: : panic 519 0 do 65 emit loop ; panic 09:26:28 herkamire: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 09:27:41 the bot truncates to 451 chars?? 09:29:27 random... but I'm glad it does truncate, cuz otherwise it might get booted 09:30:01 4th: : a ." interesting" ; a 09:30:02 herkamire: interesting 09:30:04 4th: a 09:30:05 herkamire: in file included from *the terminal*:-1 09:30:06 herkamire: /tmp/fsock-sh-server.request:1: Undefined word 09:30:06 herkamire: a 09:30:06 herkamire: ^ 09:30:06 herkamire: Backtrace: 09:30:08 herkamire: $4011D188 throw 09:30:10 herkamire: $401271E8 no.extensions 09:34:39 onetom: does it handle infinite loops? 09:37:38 --- join: [Atlas] (fare@samaris.tunes.org) joined #forth 09:54:12 recurse is cool :) 09:55:56 gforth: ." :D" 10:04:43 sif: : a dup . 1 - dup if recurse then drop ; 9 a 10:04:44 herkamire: 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 10:04:56 aaaaaahhh leluya 10:05:31 sif: .( :() 10:05:32 rob_ert: :( 10:22:46 how should alias work? ALIAS OLD NEW or ALIAS NEW OLD 10:23:06 --- join: MrGone (~mrreach@209.181.43.190) joined #forth 10:23:09 Hi MrGone 10:23:17 herkamire: Intel syntax! 10:23:20 hi rob_ert 10:23:24 i.e. the second one :) 10:26:01 --- quit: [Atlas] (Remote closed the connection) 10:41:55 ok. thanks 10:48:15 --- join: redoz (undo@m99.ryd.student.liu.se) joined #forth 10:58:17 --- join: futhin (thin@h24-64-174-2.cg.shawcable.net) joined #forth 10:58:44 hi hi 10:58:50 hihi 10:59:15 gforth: : hihi 10 0 do ." hihi" loop ; hihi 10:59:39 gforth: 1 2 + . 10:59:41 hm 10:59:53 mrreach: so what's happening? 11:00:58 getting ready to see a friend into surgery in an hour or so 11:02:28 she has gallstones 11:02:30 so, is forth alive and kicking? 11:02:31 :( 11:02:51 redoz: it's kicking for sure :P 11:02:51 depends who you ask, but yes I'd say it is 11:03:28 so, what is it used for, what are it's strengths? 11:03:37 what platforms does it compile on.. 11:03:38 etc.. 11:03:44 --- nick: MrGone -> MrReach 11:03:56 redoz: any platform 11:03:57 well it's a great general purpose language except it needs more support & needs to be extended more 11:04:04 it's highest and best use at this point is still in embedded apps 11:04:27 embedded as in uCs, stuff like that? 11:04:29 it's a great low-level language, but also is a great high-level & script-like language .. 11:04:33 there are several general purpose versions out there, and they work pretty well 11:05:12 I've seen it used to write a web server (hasn't every language?) ... to parse queries 11:05:26 rob_ert: do I have to do intel syntax??? it's harder 11:05:35 I myself only use it when its low-level functions are not provided in TCL 11:05:44 ok, anyone have a forth example? 11:06:07 : hello ." Hello world!" ; hello 11:06:17 sif: : hello ." Hello world!" ; hello 11:06:18 MrReach: Hello world! 11:06:19 ok, you wanna explain that too? 11:06:41 sif is a bot that interprets forth code and sends the output back to the channel 11:06:52 redoz: is this for a class or something? 11:07:13 MrReach: hehe :) no actually 11:07:16 just interested 11:07:22 ok ... 11:07:28 : hello ." Hello world!" ; hello 11:07:48 the colon tells the forth interpreter to begin compiling a new definition 11:08:13 like a function? 11:08:15 or subroutine 11:08:16 it parses the next "word" from the stream and creates an entry for it in the dictionary 11:08:21 correct 11:09:02 the ." is a word that parses the text stream to the next ", then compiles a string literal, and a call to send that literal to stdout 11:09:27 the ; (semicolon) ends the definition and makes the word findable in the dictionary 11:09:53 the last word, hello, executes the new defenition 11:09:57 ok, so normally youd have a newline after the ; 11:10:01 for readability 11:10:06 yes 11:10:16 well that seems easy enough.. 11:10:30 by convention, the colon, name, and a stack comment go in one line at the top 11:10:41 so if I wanted to run 'hello' twice..? 11:10:52 then maybe several lines of comment describing the word 11:11:09 sif: : hello ." Hello world!" ; hello hello hello 11:11:10 MrReach: Hello world!Hello world!Hello world! 11:11:14 : 2 0 do ." hello" loop ; 11:11:36 ooops, I should have added some whitespace 11:11:42 but you don't normally cram all of this on the same line? 11:11:51 no, not normally 11:11:56 ok 11:12:09 sif only remembers definitions for one line of code 11:12:10 so is there a win32 compiler? 11:12:24 plenty of them :) 11:12:26 yes, there's a few different forths for win32 11:12:29 forth comes in "systems" ... and yes there are several for win32 11:12:41 systems eh? 11:12:53 uh.. forth comes in "forths" 11:12:54 forth is both an interpreter and a compiler ... so the best term is "forth system" 11:12:56 http://www.forth.org/compilers.html 11:13:16 my favorite for windows is Win32Forth 11:13:17 lists a bunch of the better-known ones... 11:14:16 so what do you guys use forth for+ 11:14:23 anything 11:14:31 write an imap mail notifier? 11:14:36 sure 11:14:57 some things can be difficult because of lack of support.. 11:15:00 does it have window toolkits? 11:15:07 or support for native win32 calls? 11:15:13 I've only got one forth app going at the moment ... and that's a light-sound machine ... it uses mutimedia sound and drive the output pins of the printer port 11:15:15 or rather native win32 windows 11:15:19 win32forth lets u do gui and stuff i think.. 11:15:41 win32toolkits are lacking, but can call arbitrary libs/dlls 11:15:47 win32forth has some gui support & supports native win32 calls i think.. 11:16:57 it really needs a widget toolkit 11:17:12 hm 11:17:23 bigforth has an excellent widget toolkit, that's what it is written for, but it's not hardly documented 11:17:25 it uses RPN too doesn't it? 11:17:31 yes, it does 11:17:36 that's a + :) 11:17:40 sif: 4 3 + . 11:17:41 MrReach: 7 11:18:10 dot prints whatever number is on the top of stack (TOS) 11:18:24 so everything gets places on the stack ? 11:18:30 placed 11:18:38 generally, yes 11:18:54 parameters are passed on the stack. 11:19:06 there are memory structs, too, of course, but the stack is where data is expected to reside be tween words 11:19:26 hm, well, it sounds like a fun language 11:19:40 I'm just not sure what I would use it for :) 11:19:40 there is no syntax for passing parameters, you just put the parameters on the stack and call a word 11:19:57 redoz: neither are we I think... 11:20:04 yes, "fun" is a good word ... especially because you can change the behavior and sytax in any way you wish 11:20:19 redoz: I made this bot for fun, and tathi and I are making an Operating System in it. 11:21:03 the problem with forth is usually a lack of support for libs and APIs. 11:22:05 We've been wanting to write our own operating system, so that's not a problem as we will be coding everything from scratch anyway 11:22:34 heh, where forth *IS* the libs and API 11:22:38 if you want to do graphics, be sure to pick a forth that has a graphics API built it 11:22:51 MrReach: exactly :) 11:23:10 once everything is in forth it's Beautiful. you have a rediculous amount of access to everything. 11:24:51 herkamire: so why aren't you in in #forthOS ? 11:25:22 redoz: :) I haven't seen anybody in there that's not also in here :) 11:25:46 true 11:25:46 I'll join though 11:26:09 do you have a detailed plan on your os, or are you just hacking along? 11:26:43 so far, tathi's doing all the work 11:27:03 --- topic: set to 'Forth - comprehensible, small, interactive, fast, extensible, and easy to work with at a high level of abstraction <|> get isforth at http://isforth.clss.net <|> enriching Forth & the support of it - come to #forthos' by ChanServ 11:27:25 ugh, what kind of separators should i use? <|> kinda sucks.. 11:27:46 " --- " 11:27:55 that's long 11:27:58 herkamire: well that sounds like a good plan :) 11:28:07 i want short but good separators :) 11:28:10 HAHAHA! 11:28:48 redoz: we have a plan, it's not huge, but I don't think it's great to get too far ahead of ourselves. 11:28:49 redoz: onetom & i & others will be planning & designing an os 11:29:40 redoz: We plan to make a terminal interface and write an editor that is built in. We will have it boot up into the forth interpreter (of course) 11:30:14 ok 11:30:21 sounds like a fun project 11:30:30 what about filesystems? 11:30:45 we have done some thinking about graphics APIs and protected memory and multitasking etc, but I think it's good to not make plans untill you have a use for them. 11:30:51 mrreach: ? 11:30:56 redoz: no filesystem. 11:31:04 uhm..ok.. 11:31:10 redoz: We'll make a filesystem if we need it. 11:31:10 yes? 11:31:23 mrreach: just wondering what you were laughing at.. 11:31:27 this might be a sweet thing for a car mp3 player..stuff like that..or am I way of fnow? 11:31:46 futhin: redoz's comment that it was a good plan to let others do all the work 11:32:24 redoz: for MP3s you need hardware support or a fast processor I think. 11:33:05 well "fast" 11:33:11 Does anyone here know a page with an english charachter frequency table? 11:33:14 a 486 dx4 will do iirc 11:33:17 --- join: XeF4 (venmbc@12-245-116-85.client.attbi.com) joined #forth 11:33:18 --- topic: set to 'Forth - comprehensible, small, interactive, fast, extensible, and easy to work with at a high level of abstraction / get isforth at http://isforth.clss.net / enriching Forth & the support of it - come to #forthos' by ChanServ 11:33:33 At first all we will have on our system is code and documentation, and we are just going to use the blocks on the disk (every other will be code) 11:33:37 redoz: Hej förresteb :) 11:33:47 hello? 11:33:48 s/b/n/ 11:33:53 the documentation for the block of code will be in the next block. 11:34:23 ok, so what is your goal with the OS? 11:34:27 fascinating. that has never been done before. 11:34:49 XeF4: the every other block thing? I believe that's what Chuck Moore is doing. 11:35:23 redoz: to make software development simple and easy and quick, and to have a system that is fast and simple 11:35:28 herk: that has been convention for ~30 years 11:35:31 it's similar to shadow blocks in the venerable F83 11:36:10 cool. Chuck said something about a "shadow block" and I was guessing that he meant this 11:36:29 herkamire: hmm 11:36:56 well, generally shadow blocks are kept in a seperate file so that the source file can be interpreted w/o interruption 11:37:22 sometimes shadow blocks are placed at the end of the file 11:37:52 cool :) well, we don't have any plans for "files" yet. just blocks. 11:37:57 if we need files we'll implement them 11:38:25 it will be a system that you can make do anything (rather than one that already does everything) 11:38:44 so will this be like V2os 11:38:46 no, I meant that the shadow bocks are *NOT* interlaced with the source blocks ... hoever that is accomplished 11:38:50 something you put on a floppy and boot? 11:39:17 redoz: we would do that, except we don't have floppy drives :) 11:39:28 you don't have floppy drives? 11:39:36 what kind of hardware are you using? 11:39:51 redoz: instead of buying one I just got another hard drive for $20 11:40:07 ah 11:40:13 I have a dual G4 (Apple hardware) 11:40:18 ah 11:40:23 makes sense 11:40:31 great hardware :) 11:40:37 20 bucks for a harddrive? 11:40:39 I'm sure, bit expensive though 11:40:40 how big? 11:40:50 1200MB 11:40:54 yo ucan get 80gig för $150 now 11:40:58 barracuda IV 11:41:13 let's here it for ebay :) 11:41:17 umm this is a forth system 11:41:25 I don't need 80GB 11:41:27 doesn't matter how big, the kernel is not likely to exceed 100K ... and the sources 500K 11:41:30 1.2 GB is _way_ more than I can ever imagine using :) 11:41:43 herkamire: I got 240gig, well 160 of that is in the mail 11:41:43 I have thirty for linux and Mac OS and I don't know what to do with it except rip every CD I like. 11:42:00 I have cable internet, and my disk isn't really filling up 11:42:19 mine is 11:42:21 I'm a music phreak, downloaded over a gig of music just today 11:42:26 our forth system will run fine in 1MB for quite a while I think. 11:42:32 MrReach: actually, with the huffman-encoded colorforth source, the source is almost always smaller than the binary... 11:42:33 i have 100 gigs of anime 11:42:34 bwahahah! :P 11:42:43 actually, it's 120 11:43:20 wierd 11:43:49 I have 2.5 GB of mp3s and probably a few MB of other data that's important 11:44:08 herkamire: no, weird :p 11:44:52 redoz: I would like more music, but I don't mind getting a drive for music. 11:45:24 hm..ok.. 11:45:42 so this OS will only host a forth compiler/editor/interpreter 11:45:50 anyway, with forth code and good programming you can make your programs/system VERY small 11:46:20 hm 11:46:22 Chuck Moore has made a forth operating system that he's been using for over a year I think and it still fits comfortably on a floppy disk. 11:46:33 (system and programs) 11:46:39 but it wont be the next BeOS :) 11:46:57 what do you mean the next BeOS? 11:47:04 the idea is many small pieces of functionality 11:47:12 "be cooler than Mac and be bought out" 11:47:16 oh :) 11:47:29 no, sorry I'm confusing it with NExt 11:47:36 over a year.. he uses his VLSI CAD on colorforth i think, and that was made about 1995 or something.. 11:48:00 so colorforth has been in existance for awhile, and he's been using it 11:48:38 7 years of development by a genious and it still only takes up what? half the floppy? 11:48:46 wth many small pieces, surprising synergies often result 11:48:49 with documentation 11:49:01 (well, some documentation anyway) 11:49:29 somebody was noticing that he wrote way more documentation than code 11:50:41 my cat is eating my food 11:50:47 *puts the cat back on the floor* 11:52:46 time to go to the hospital 11:52:50 --- nick: MrReach -> MrGone 11:53:42 redoz: My sisters hamster peed in my bed :/ 11:53:53 *removed sister + hamster* 11:54:39 that's gross 11:55:38 Gross? 11:55:55 disgusting 11:56:05 www.dict.org is your friend :) 11:56:11 lies 11:56:16 www.m-w.com is your friend 11:56:16 so, where are ya from, I'm asuming sweden? 11:56:40 futhin: ah, nice *bookmarks* 11:56:57 redoz: Yup. 11:57:01 redoz: .telia.com :) 11:57:21 And you? .liu.se reminds me of Linköpings Universitet. 11:57:27 yep 12:00:54 comp. sci. student..go figure 12:01:23 in here?!? no way 12:01:27 ;) 12:02:24 yeah, I guess you don't see a lot of those around :p 12:11:38 I found something to use forth for 12:11:55 what? 12:12:15 http://www.lysator.liu.se/realtimebattle/ 12:12:23 well either that or lisp.. 12:17:19 I was just this morning thinking about doing something like that, actually :) 12:37:28 I've been wanting a cool contest like that, where I could write my bot in forth. I'm not interested in doing all the text parsing right now (it probably wouldn't take all that long, but it seems soo pointless) 12:37:47 I'm in a lazy mood I guess. speaking of which... I should probably do some "work" 12:39:44 hi 12:40:06 hi :) 12:40:21