00:00:00 --- log: started forth/06.04.20 01:09:20 --- join: Ray-work (n=Raystm2@adsl-68-90-192-85.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net) joined #forth 01:09:20 --- quit: Ray_work (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 01:15:58 --- quit: Raystm2_ (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 01:18:37 --- join: Raystm2 (n=Raystm2@adsl-68-95-254-38.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net) joined #forth 05:18:07 --- join: Cheery (i=Henri@a81-197-61-21.elisa-laajakaista.fi) joined #forth 05:20:07 --- join: PoppaVic (n=pete@0-2pool238-21.nas24.chicago4.il.us.da.qwest.net) joined #forth 05:35:58 humph... I believe part of the reason I'm suffering is - I'm mixing inner and outer-interpreters 05:59:27 hi 06:06:17 howdy 06:26:08 hmm.. Isn't "pad" a waste of time? 06:40:12 --- join: Amanita_Virosa (n=jenni@adsl-69-154-178-250.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net) joined #forth 06:50:28 --- quit: Amanita_Virosa ("Wewps.") 07:34:37 --- join: JasonWoof (n=jason@c-71-192-33-206.hsd1.ma.comcast.net) joined #forth 07:34:37 --- mode: ChanServ set +o JasonWoof 07:48:57 hmm.. Isn't "pad" a waste of time? 07:52:43 why? 07:53:39 Not sure... Isn't it the equiv of sprintf? 07:54:06 or, I should say "It's uses" 07:54:28 ... 07:55:28 Seems like a cross between a local-buffer and a global-buffer, but I am not sure why. 07:55:49 ... 07:56:04 I added one, to my code - but it seems like the users are the issue. 07:59:46 OK, I removed it - looks spastic 08:29:20 --- quit: virl (Remote closed the connection) 08:29:24 --- quit: PoppaVic ("Pulls the pin...") 08:47:10 --- quit: Ray-work (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 09:16:22 --- join: GoHst10 (i=WINNT@12-208-98-237.client.insightBB.com) joined #forth 09:21:04 --- quit: GoHst10 (Remote closed the connection) 09:35:09 --- join: timlarson_ (n=timlarso@65.116.199.19) joined #forth 10:02:42 --- join: PoppaVic (n=pete@0-1pool46-190.nas30.chicago4.il.us.da.qwest.net) joined #forth 10:09:13 --- join: Quartus (n=trailer@CPE0001023f6e4f-CM013349902843.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) joined #forth 10:16:37 hmm... doesn't 'state' only matter to the outer-interpreter? 10:19:12 ..in fact... Isn't 'base' only useful to the outer-interpreter? 10:19:48 yes 10:20:15 (or rather: <# #> and friends 10:20:17 so, they are both (preferably) of use to the outer - NOT the inner-interp, right? 10:20:43 not sure why the inner interpreter would ever have to convert a textual representation of a number 10:21:01 yeah, me either... Seems like it'd be compiled args 10:21:35 I could never quite get myself to learn about <# #> and friends 10:21:42 humph.. I think I had a lightbulb-phase. 10:21:52 JasonWoof: I never liked them - some folks love 'em 10:23:36 I believe I made a "breakthru", by simply noting the VM is not _both_ "inner" and "outer" interpreters... I've been doing breakout since then, this AM 10:26:15 I _have_ been trying to decide if heads should ref a multiplexed 'body' or reference a statewise PAIR of bodies. 10:30:47 personally, I do NOT like 'words' that screw around with 'state' - They just bug me. 11:04:06 anybody know of a forth for the ti89? 11:07:45 --- quit: PoppaVic ("Pulls the pin...") 11:37:01 BASE is only useful to NUMBER? , even. 11:37:14 well, and anything that displays numbers. 11:56:15 BASE is 10. always. :-) 11:56:29 and not just because i work in hex al the time 12:16:12 --- quit: Cheery ("Leaving") 12:18:40 --- join: snoopy_1711 (i=snoopy_1@dslb-084-058-159-176.pools.arcor-ip.net) joined #forth 12:19:24 --- quit: Snoopy42 (Nick collision from services.) 13:24:40 --- nick: Raystm2 -> nanstm 14:01:20 --- quit: timlarson_ ("Leaving") 14:29:12 --- join: virl (n=virl@chello062178085149.1.12.vie.surfer.at) joined #forth 14:37:12 hi 14:37:13 ping 14:52:36 hi 14:53:08 --- nick: nanstm -> tiff 14:53:25 good evening everyone 14:53:33 --- mode: ChanServ set +o crc 14:53:50 hi 15:09:43 --- nick: tiff -> nanstm 18:00:15 --- quit: virl (Remote closed the connection) 18:36:48 --- quit: uiuiuiu (Remote closed the connection) 18:36:49 --- join: uiuiuiu_ (i=ian@dslb-084-056-232-107.pools.arcor-ip.net) joined #forth 18:42:45 --- quit: JasonWoof ("off to bed!") 19:10:59 --- nick: nanstm -> Raystm2 22:41:22 --- quit: ayrnieu ("system") 23:19:22 --- join: segher_ (n=segher@dslb-084-056-156-155.pools.arcor-ip.net) joined #forth 23:25:21 --- quit: segher (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 23:45:11 --- join: charles` (n=charles`@host-64-139-245-63.nctv.com) joined #forth 23:45:30 is it possible to have a pointer to position on the argument stack? 23:45:49 and on to a position on the float stack 23:46:12 s/on/one 23:54:57 --- quit: charles` (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) 23:59:59 --- log: ended forth/06.04.20