Subj : Routing issue
To   : Flavio Bessa
From : Nick Boel
Date : Wed Oct 22 2025 06:18 pm

Hey Flavio!

On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 12:47:46 -0300, you wrote:

 > My routing table is as per below:

 > Netmail Route (Top-Down Priority)

 > Route 1:* 2:* 3:* 4:* !4:801/* to 4:902/26
 > Route 3:770/1 to 3:770/1
 > Route 4:801/197 to 4:801/197
 > Route 4:801/200 to 4:801/200
 > Route 4:801/201 to 4:801/201
 > Route 4:801/161 to 4:801/161
 > Route 4:801/189 to 4:801/189
 > Route 4:801/188 to 4:801/188
 > Route 4:801/194 to 4:801/194
 > Route 4:801/10 to 4:801/10
 > Route 4:801/202 to 4:801/202
 > Route 4:900/108 to 4:900/108
 > Route 4:801/203 to 4:801/203

 > So, apart from the locally connected nodes, everything should be routed
 > to 4:902/26, right?

Yes. However, you may not need any of the others, as these are not really 
"routes", these are direct connections. I think with Mystic you can probably 
blank out the route line for each of the 'direct' links.

Or if you'd rather change them to 'route' statements, then for example, route 
3:770/1.* to 3:770.1

 > However, I have received a netmail from Z3 as such:

 > + Oct 22 12:30:11    Importing 0d619a84.pkt (4:900/108 to 4:80/1)
 > + Oct 22 12:30:11    Route (Paul Hayton@3:770/100 to JAS@4:900/733) via
 > 4:900/108

 > And 4:900/108 should not receive any netmail from me.. this netmail
 > towards 4:900/733 should have been routed over 4:902/26... Any specific
 > change I should do on my routing table?

I'm unsure why it did that, and if all you have is what you wrote above, it 
definitely shouldn't. but try either of the above and see if it happens again 
afterwards.

Regards,
Nick

.... Sarcasm: because beating people up is illegal.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20250409
 * Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)

.