People weren't born on Earth? According to Dr. Ellis in the book "Humans are not from Earth" (https://bit.ly/3JqJLH8), people can suffer from back pain because our species originally evolved on another planet with lower gravity. Dr. Ellis also points out the weirdness of newborns having large heads and making labor difficult for mothers, which can be fatal for both mother and baby. According to Dr. Ellis, Neanderthals were most likely interbred with another species in the distant past, possibly with the Alpha Centauri star system, which is one of the closest solar systems to Earth, resulting in modern humans. Dr. Ellis explains that this suggests that humanity may have evolved on another planet, and here we were brought as a highly evolved species. One reason for this is that Earth could be a prison planet, as we seem to be a naturally aggressive species and are here until we learn to behave ourselves. Dr. Ellis concludes that humanity did not develop here initially, but developed elsewhere and was transferred to Earth between 60000 and 200000 years ago. As Robert Sefer notes, according to modern DNA sequencing data, it has been proven that humanity as we know it is not just one single "race" descended from one ancestor in Africa, but a hybridized species, behind all this is a much more mysterious truth. ... During the discussion about Rh negative blood, many questions have been raised. If humanity really descended from a common ancient African ancestor, then, according to theories, the blood of all people would be compatible, but, unfortunately, this is not the case. In this regard, many questions arise, to which only science is not able to provide exhaustive answers. Where does Rh negative blood come from? And why is an Rh negative mother carrying Rh positive children trying to reject her own offspring? Is it possible that this is due to a rather controversial theory? A theory that suggests that humanity is not really one race, but a hybridized species. Basques living in Spain and France have the highest percentage of Rh negative blood. About 30% have (rr) Rh negative blood and about 60% carry one (r) negative gene. There are 612 species and subspecies of primates recognized by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and none of them have Rh-negative blood, - sums up Robert Seper.