Vaccines against Covid 19 is biological weapon?

Source: (https://bit.ly/3Bt3ELs)
For anybody paying attention (and is also capable of simple
arithmetic), it is now crystal clear that the negative effects
of the COVID-19 "vaccines" far, far, far, far outweigh any
benefits they ostensibly provide. (If they even provide any,
considering their tendency to cause negative efficacy.) But
the truth behind the experimental injections is far darker
and more twisted than a completely out-of-whack risk-reward
ratio. On the contrary, as pharma industry insider Sasha
Latypova outlines in her presentation below, it turns out the
injections are not actually pharmaceutical products at all.
Instead, they are military products. And ones that Latypova
claims - with overwhelming supporting evidence - behave
as a literal bioweapon. 
Latypova, a serial pharmaceutical entrepreneur who spent more
than 25 years in the pharmaceutical industry during her career
 - working with over 60 pharma companies all over the world,
including Pfizer - has been delivering one bombshell
announcement after another lately regarding the COVID-19
"vaccines." One of the biggest of which has been the fact that
the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) - and not pharmaceutical
companies like Pfizer and Moderna - has ultimately been
responsible for the COVID "vaccines'" manufacturing and
distribution. The latter step occurring after the injections go
through what Latypova refers to as the DoD "black box."
In this relatively new presentation, which she recently posted
to her BitChute channel dubbed Team Enigma, Latypova outlines
how exactly the DoD has orchestrated the rollout of the COVID
injections from manufacturing to distribution. Injections that she
claims, and shows, are "toxic by design" due to their employing
"mechanisms of injury," such as forcing a recipient's body to
produce a literally unidentifiable version of the SARS-CoV-2
spike protein. 
The pharma industry veteran goes into more detail than in any
of her other presentations so far regarding the covert DoD
operation, particularly in regards to how it's been enabled through
changes in federal law over the past several decades.
Key amongst those legal changes were several from 1997, when
Congress passed two laws including the FDA Modernization Act
and The National Defense Authorization Act, which, combined,
allow for implementation of an Emergency Use Authorization
(EUA) for a given medical product. Which, in turn, (as Latypova
notes) "gets rid of the FDA's safety and efficacy regulations and
allows [the] FDA to issue emergency use authorizations for certain
products which they deem required."
Along with the federal legal changes in '97, Latypova also highlights
the implementation of 10 U.S. Code § 4021, which amended the
Other Transaction Authority (OTA) of the DoD. As Cornell's Legal
Information Institute describes, OTA gives "The Secretary of Defense
and the Secretary of each military department [the ability to] enter
into transactions (other than contracts, cooperative agreements, and
grants) [in order to carry] out basic, applied, and advanced research
projects." Cornell's Institute adds "The authority under this
subsection is in addition to the authority provided in section 4001
of this title to use contracts, cooperative agreements, and grants
in carrying out such projects."
In other words, 10 U.S. Code § 4021, implemented under the Obama
Administration in 2015, allows the DoD to order "undisclosed
military prototypes" from private manufacturers, such as
pharmaceutical companies. Not only that, but it allows the private
contractors making the DoD's military prototypes to completely
avoid any kind of manufacturing, safety, or efficacy disclosures.
The last keystone of the "pseudo-legalization" of EUA-covered
military "countermeasures," Latypova notes, was the Public Readiness
and Emergency Preparedness Act - or PREP Act - which allows the
head of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to
unilaterally issue declarations recommending the manufacture,
testing, development, distribution, administration, and use of one
or more countermeasures.
Shortly before the supposed SARS-CoV-2 "global pandemic" (which
the WHO literally refers to as a PHEIC or "fake" emergency, read
more about that immediately above), Latypova notes the PREP
Act was amended, "very thoroughly" exempting "anyone participating
in this program, in this activity, in this bioterrorism program, from
any liability from lawsuits [or] from injuries and deaths caused by
these actions." 
Subsequently, the Trump administration declaring a national public
health emergency in 2020 - one that's been continually extended by
the Biden administration - has allowed for the DoD to rollout the
fully legally immunized COVID injections. Latypova notes the public
health emergency must continue in perpetuity, as "this is the
keystone that holds all of this criminal structure together."
Latypova refers to this legal framework as a "criminal structure,"
in part, because these "undisclosed military products" can literally
be weapons; including "biological, chemical, radiological,
or nuclear" weapons. The pharma insider adds "all of [these weapons]
can fall under the vaguely defined terms [of the DoD's OTA
contracts]." 
Key to initiating the ability for the DoD to rollout these legally
immunized, largely undisclosed products, Latypova shows, is the
HHS Secretary declaring a public health emergency. 
On top of this pseudo-legal criminal structure, Latypova notes the
perpetrators of this COVID scam - including the DoD, Pfizer,
Moderna, etc. - had "ample means, motive, and opportunity through…
OTA contracts to ensure that no evidence ever becomes available."
Latypova adds there has also been "huge media collusion to ensure
that there is no evidence; suppression of evidence. Censorship.
Deletions. Deplatforming. Hiding. And lying and obfuscation."
Most critically, Latypova shows how EUA "medical" countermeasures,
"once designated as such by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services, shall not be considered to constitute a clinical
investigation." This is why the FDA "approving" the COVID
injections has simply been a theatric performance. Simply a farce
with no legal or regulatory impact on the rollout of the undisclosed
military products (i.e. the COVID injections).
"[The COVID injections] are not actually clinical investigational
products," Latypova says, "meaning that they're not subject to any
normal pharmaceutical regulatory rules. And that's why they're not
countermeasures… you can only say what they're not. And we
definitively can say here that [the COVID injections] are not
pharmaceutical products." The pharma insider clarifies that "when
[the] FDA goes on media and says, 'Oh, you know, we reviewed
COVID-19 vaccines and they're safe and effective, they're lying
in many, many ways… ." 
The first way the FDA is lying is that the agency is talking about
the injections as if they have regulatory authority over them, when
it does not. Likewise, the COVID "vaccine" development and
approval "could be named [after] a movie or a theater production
or show, [as] it's a performance…" Latypova says. She adds "there
is no vaccine development and approval because these products
are not pharmaceuticals. They're not vaccines, they're
countermeasures under EUA, under public health emergency,
they're not subject to any regulation. Especially not pharmaceutical
regulation."
This explains the very strange use of the word "demonstration"
in the DoD contracts with the likes of Pfizer, Moderna, et al.
Latypova adds the use of "demonstration" legally makes any
regulation by the FDA in regards to the COVID-19 vaccines
- including their clinical trials - utterly moot. "You cannot do
a clinical trial for something that… cannot be an investigational
clinical product. Also, the Good Manufacturing compliance was
not ordered by these contracts because it's not possible because
the COVID injections are not a pharmaceutical product. What [the]
FDA is really doing is they're impersonating… regulators and lying
to the public." 
As a result of the DoD being solely responsible for the manufacturing
and delivery of the COVID injections, "no regulators in the world
know what protein is actually expressed by these mRNA injections."
Apparently Pfizer, Moderna, and other ostensible producers of the
COVID injections are claiming they're injecting people with the
mRNA code for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, when, in fact, it's
not publicly known what's being injected, except for the fact that it
is not the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Latypova says this is
definitive, as the only thing that's known about the produced spike
protein is that it is far heavier (in terms of molecular weight) than
the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Furthermore, the manufacturers
of the COVID injections (around the world) say it's not even
possible to figure out what kind of protein the injections are
developing in the human body.
As far as the national COVID-19 response plan, Latypova notes it
was the National Security Council (NSC) that developed and
implemented it. The pharma insider notes that "since 2018 at least
we had a pandemic action plan that was called PanCAP, and that
pandemic action plan stated that HHS was actually in charge
of pretty much everything… [and] did not include stupid things
like lockdowns. And would not mandate masks on everybody."
Those were "more reasonable and normal and science-based actions
that were recommended in those plans." 
In 2020, the NSC's PanCAP told "a completely different story." In
that version, the NSC was in charge of emergency public health
policies. This is incredible, as the NSC does not even include public
health agencies typically involved with public health emergencies.
On the contrary, it mostly consists of national defense and
intelligence leaders. "So now, all of the sudden, since 2020 [these
NSC council members have been put] in charge of COVID policy."
While the NSC was in charge of formulating the COVID policy,
Latypova notes it was FEMA who ostensibly implemented it because
Trump declared a national health emergency under the Stafford Act.
FEMA, however, was "only a figurehead role… [and has been]
visible, ceremonial, but unimportant…" Latypova adds "the HHS
[has only been] in the information and propaganda role."
After Trump invoked the Stafford Act he initiated Operation Warp
Speed (OWS), which was brought in to develop the COVID
injections and other countermeasures such as therapeutics and
diagnostic tools. Latypova notes OWS was sold as a collaborative
effort between HHS and the DoD, "but the actual organization
structure" shows it was the latter agency that was entirely in
charge.
Latypova shows an organizational chart revealing the decision-making
structure behind OWS, with the DoD in the most executive role. The
HHS was only the "chief science advisor." This "makes it very clear
that the Department of Defense [was] in charge of the whole thing,".