The WEF Talks About Mind Control Using Sound Waves 

The World Economic Forum – one of the most powerful elite
organizations in the world – recently discussed the emergence
of remote mind control technology. And it admits that it could
be used to turn humans into mind-controlled slaves
(https://bit.ly/3xi9iNF).
The World Economic Forum (WEF) is one of the most influential
elite organizations, alongside the Council on Foreign Relations,
the Bilderberg group, and the Trilateral Commision. Every year,
the forum brings together some 2500 top business leaders,
international political leaders, economists, celebrities and
journalists to discuss world issues.
In many ways, the WEF is similar to the Bilderberg Group. Interesting
fact: Klaus Schwab, the Founder and Executive Chairman of the WEF
is a former member of the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group.
Not unlike other powerful organizations that claim to “help the
world”, the WEF is accused of actually promoting the interests of the
world elite.
The Transnational Institute describes the World Economic Forum’s
main purpose as:
“To function as a socializing institution for the emerging global
elite, globalization’s “Mafiocracy” of bankers, industrialists,
oligarchs, technocrats and politicians. They promote common ideas,
and serve common interests: their own.”
Far from actually solving world problems, the WEF is accused of
simply shifting the blame from governments and major conglomerates
to regular citizens.
“A study, published in the Journal of Consumer Research, investigated
the sociological impact of the WEF. It concluded that the WEF do not
solve issues such as poverty, global warming, chronic illness, or
debt. They have simply shifted the burden for the solution of these
problems from governments and business to “responsible consumers
subjects: the green consumer, the health-conscious consumer, and the
financially literate consumer.” They merely reframe the issues, and
by so doing perpetuate them. Gore is singled out as a prime example
 Gore’s speeches deliberately shift focus away from the problems
of unregulated markets and corporate activities to one of moral
pathologies, individual greed, etc. In doing so he is actually
promoting the creation of new markets, and hence perpetuating the
same old problems in a new guise. New markets will follow the same
patterns as the old ones because the core problem of corporate
governance is never addressed.”
– Markus Giesler Ela Veresiu, Creating the Responsible Consumer:
Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity
The WEF’s Annual Meeting of the Global Future Councils took place
on November 11-12 in the United Arab Emirates. One of the topics
discussed was “mind control using sound waves”. The WEF’s official
website published an article entitled Mind control using sound waves?
We ask a scientist how it works where University of Oxford Professor
Antoine Jerusalem describes the technology and the issues related to
it.
Well, to get straight to the science, the principle of non-invasive
neuromodulation is to focus ultrasound waves into a region in the
brain so that they all gather in a small spot. Then hopefully, given
the right set of parameters, this can change the activity of the
neurons.
If you want to get rid of neurons that have gone wild, for example in
epilepsy, then you might want to crank up the energy to essentially
kill them. But if you want to selectively promote or block the
neuronal activity, you need to fine-tune your ultrasound waves
carefully.
In other words, there’s a difference between ultrasound stimulation
used for removing tissue, and ultrasound neuromodulation, which
is aimed at controlling neuronal activity without damaging the
tissue.
Ultrasound neuromodulation is something that definitely works, but
that we still don’t understand.
The current buzzwords are Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, as
well as traumatic brain injuries. But scientists are also looking at
the spinal cord and peripheral nervous systems. As far as I am
concerned, since the brain is the de facto centre of decision for so
many processes, any of them could be targeted.
When attempting to ‘control’ neuronal activity by providing minute
mechanical vibrations to a region of the brain, it’s important that
the focus of the ultrasound, frequency and amplitude are properly
tuned, or the brain can potentially be damaged. The point is that
we still don’t know how to tune all of this; and if I were to
exaggerate a bit, I could say that our current approach is not that
far off from fiddling around with the settings on a radio until we
hear the right station.
One of the many difficulties is to know for sure that we are indeed
controllingneurons with these sound waves, as opposed to damaging
them. The truth is that we still don’t know how the process works.
And if you don’t know how it works, you don’t know how much
is “too much”.
The potential of this technique is huge – by that I mean the sheer
number of applications, as well as the ethical use.
From a biological perspective, it’s similar to drugs. It can cure
you, it can get you addicted, and it can kill you. It’s all about
staying within a given set of rules. From an ethical perspective,
the world is changing so fast that it’s difficult to assess what will
be acceptable tomorrow that is not today.
I am also convinced that human nature is such that if something can
be done, it will be done. The question is by whom. I would rather
have a fair society leading the dance than some rogue state without
any respect for human or animal life. If we want to lead that dance
10 years from now, we need to start researching today.
I can see the day coming where a scientist will be able to control
what a person sees in their mind’s eye, by sending the right waves
to the right place in their brain. My guess is that most objections
will be similar to those we hear today about subliminal messages
in advertisements, only much more vehement.
This technology is not without its risks of misuse. It could be
a revolutionary healthcare technology for the sick, or a perfect
controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak. This
time though, the control would be literal.
I am not going to argue that scientists are all wise and
knowledgeable when it comes to what should and should not be
done. Some of us will go as far as we can get away with. But that’s
human nature, and not unique to scientists.
Either way, our job is to find something that is beneficial to
humanity. And if you find a way to make somebody better, then you
most likely also know how to do the contrary. The goal is to make
sure that regulation prevents the latter, without impeding the
former. I believe that this is the role of regulators. And I think
that the European Union, where I work, is quite good at this.
Another role of politicians should be to provide a communication
platform to explain the long vision of any given area of research.
And it can be too early, or not a good idea, and the final decision
might very well be to stop it. But in the long term, the public
should have the potential benefits of a new technology explained
to them in plain words, which is something that scientists are not
necessarily good at.
Politicians should remember that if we don’t do it, then somebody
somewhere will do it anyway…potentially unregulated.
In short, Antoine Jerusalem says that remote mind control is an
incredibly powerful technology that has the power to possibly cure
illnesses. However, in the wrong hands, the technology can
completely take control of one’s brain. In his words, it can be the
“perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak”.
That being said, remote mind control is nothing new and the elite
had access to this kind of technology for years. A few months ago,
I published an article about a leaked 1996 document describing
remote mind control.
Despite the technology’s admitted dystopian potential, Antoine
Jerusalem believes that humanity cannot avoid developing it. He
probably says that because a company developing this technology
is part of the WEF. His solution to make sure that the technology
is not used to turn humans into mind control slaves? Government
regulation. In short, the WEF states that this technology should
be under the control of the global elite. Does that comfort you?