The Biotech Plan To Destroy Us

Source: (https://bit.ly/3CP1xDg)
Lew Rockwell does not appreciate the Cult forces that have hatched
this PSYOP-19 depopulation and control program ahead of the
Great Reset.
It involves nodes like the WEF, UN, CIA and of course the Research
Industrial Complex as handled by Dr. Mengele 2.0 aka Dr. Fauci and
Bill Gates. BigPharma is merely just another node along with the
Medical Industrial Complex as created by the Rockefeller Foundation
and their allopathic system of sick care. The very same Rockefeller
Foundation that created Bill Gates and funds through his "nonprofits"
all of these bioweapons and eugenics schemes.
This is all aided and abetted by an illegitimate Federal government
and their unconstitutional agencies operating out of the foreign
nation of Washington, D.C. The very same CIA that was run by George
Bush who in turn hand selected on behalf of his Cult masters each and
every one of his White House successors, with the most deleterious
Obama being a literal ground up CIA creation. And it was Obama who
"outlawed" Gain of Function (GoF) "research" in order to offshore
it to China and Ukraine.
Covid has generated a great of controversy, but one thing can't be
doubted. Covid, and the misguided attempts to combat it, have wreaked
havoc since March 2022.  How was the Covid virus created? An answer,
devastating in its implications, has just come to light. 
What you're about to read sounds like something you would expect from
one of our authors at LRC, authors whom the Left is quick to dismiss
as "conspiracy theorists." But the person we're talking about has
impeccable leftwing credentials. He's the economist Jeffrey Sachs,
famous for his work on "sustainable development" and "third-world
poverty." You couldn't miss reading about him in the mainstream
media-at least until recently.
In an interview published online in Current Affairs, on August 22,
"Prof. Sachs explains how he, as the head of the COVID-19 commission
for a leading medical journal, [The Lancet] came to the conclusion
that powerful actors were preventing a real investigation from taking
place. He also explains why it is so important to get to the bottom
of the origins of COVID: because, he says, there is extremely
dangerous research taking place with little accountability, and the
public has a right to know since we are the ones whose lives are
being put at risk without our consent. "
The "official" view is that the Covid virus was an accident that came
from contaminated animal parts in the Wuhan market in China.
Sachs suggests that studies that purport to confirm this account have
been faked. "Well, the funny thing is those scientists who are saying
that said the same thing on February 4, 2020, before they had done
any research at all. And they published the same statement in March
2020, before they had any facts at all. So they're creating
a narrative. And they're denying the alternative hypothesis without
looking closely at it. That's the basic point. "
That's the "official" truth, in other words the government lies,
about Covid. What does Sachs think was really going on? "The
alternative hypothesis is quite straightforward. And that is that
there was a lot of research underway in the United States and China
on taking SARS-like viruses, manipulating them in the laboratory,
and creating potentially far more dangerous viruses. And the
particular virus that causes COVID-19, called SARS-Cov-2, is notable
because it has a piece of its genetic makeup that makes the virus
more dangerous. And that piece of the genome is called the 'furin
cleavage site.' Now, what's interesting, and concerning if I may say
so, is that the research that was underway very actively and being
promoted, was to insert furin cleavage sites into SARS-like viruses
to see what would happen. Oops!"
It gets worse. The "scientists" who published the "accidental market
mishap" theory knew it was false, but they circulated this lie to
cover up biotech research they didn't want disturbed. "At the
beginning, which we could date from the first phone call of the
National Institutes of Health (NIH) with a group of virologists on
February 1, 2020, the virologists said ‘Oh my god, that is strange,
that could well be a laboratory creation. What is that furin cleavage
site doing in there?' Because scientists knew that was part of an
active ongoing research program. And yet, by February 3, the same
group is saying 'No, no, it's natural, it's natural.' By February 4,
they start to draft the papers that are telling the public, 'Don't
worry, it's natural.' By March, they write a paper-totally spurious,
in my view-called the proximal origins paper that is the most cited
bio paper in 2020. It said: it is absolutely natural.
But they didn't have any of the data that you read about in the New
York Times. They didn't have any of this. They just said the labs
weren't working on this alternative. But you know what, they
don't know what the labs were working on, because they never
asked, and NIH hasn't told us."
Sachs is emphatic about this: "So my point is, there is a huge amount
of reason to believe that that research was underway. Because there
are published papers on this. There are interviews on this. There
are research proposals. But NIH isn't talking. It's not asking. And
these scientists have never asked either. From the very first day,
they have kept hidden from view the alternative. And when they
discuss the alternative, they don't discuss the research program.
They discuss complete straw men about the lab, not the actual kind
of research that was underway, which was to stick furin cleavage
sites into SARS-like viruses in a way that could have created
SARS-Cov-2.
What I'm calling for is not the conclusion. I'm calling for the
investigation. Finally, after two and a half years of this, it's
time to fess up that it might have come out of a lab and here's the
data that we need to know to find out whether it did."
When you read this, you of course want to know more details about
motives for the plot Sachs has uncovered. Sachs has an answer: "One
thing that is rather clear to me is that there is so much dangerous
research underway right now under the umbrella of biodefense or
other things that we don't know about, that is not being properly
controlled. This is for sure. And that's happening around the world.
And governments say ‘don't poke your nose into that.' That's our
business, not your business. But it's actually our business. It's our
business to understand what is going on with this. This is not to be
kept secret. We don't trust you.
Let me put it this way: I don't trust them right now. I want to know.
Because even what we know of the dangerous research is enough
to raise a lot of questions of responsibility for the future. And to
pose the question: ‘Hey, what other viruses are you guys working
on? What should we know?' Because no matter what the truth is
on SARS-Cov-2, what is pretty clear is we've got so much
technological capacity to engineer dangerous pathogens right now.
And a lot of that is being done. And it's classified. It's secret, and
we don't know what it is. And I don't like that feeling at all.
I don't recommend it for us and for the world."
LRC readers won't be surprised that the monster "Dr." Anthony Fauci
is in this up to his neck. "The alternative that is the right one to
look at is part of a very extensive research program that was
underway from 2015 onward, funded by the NIH, by Tony Fauci,
in particular NIAID [National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases], and it was to examine the spillover potential of SARS-like
viruses. The champions of this research explained in detail their
proposals. But after the event, we'd never asked them, 'So what were
you actually doing? What experiments did you do? What do you
know?' We somehow never asked. It was better just to sweep it under
the rug, which is what Fauci and the NIH have done up until this
point. Maybe they could tell us, ‘Oh, full exoneration,' but they
haven't told us that at all. They haven't shown us anything.
So there's nothing ‘kooky' about it, because it's precisely what the
scientists were doing. And then you can listen to the scientists on
tape describing why they think the research program is so important,
because they say these are dangerous viruses, and therefore we have
to prepare broad spectrum vaccines and drugs. They explain it's not
good enough to test one or two viruses. We have to test all of them.
And then they came to realize, as I said earlier, that just having
a SARS-like virus, if it doesn't have this piece of the gene, it's
almost surely not going to be that effective. So they got around
to the idea. ‘Well, let's put these in,' if you can imagine that. To my
mind, it's mind-boggling.'
Sachs compares the biotech danger to the threat of nuclear war.
"I can tell you one thing that I've learned from talking to a lot of
scientists in the last couple of years: the technological capacity
to do dangerous things using this biotechnology is extraordinary
right now. So I want to know what's being done. I want to know
what other governments are doing, too, not just ours. I want some
global control over this stuff.
We've kind of understood the nuclear risk-even that, of course, is
in a lot of ways hidden from view. But this is a clear and present
risk. And there's reason to believe we're actually in the midst of
it, not just hypothetically. So come on: it's time to open the books
everywhere. It's time to find out. Maybe it was the marketplace.
Maybe it wasn't a lab. But we need to get real answers, now. Not
the kind of misdirection that's been going in since February 2020.
Enough nonsense! Enough New York Times stories saying,
'Oh, it's this, it's that,' without looking closely at the very
plausible laboratory hypothesis.
There's more. As the great Murray Rothbard would have said,
"Get this!" "The most interesting things that I got as chair of the
Lancet commission came from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
lawsuits and whistleblower leaks from inside the U.S. government.
Isn't that terrible? NIH was actually asked at one point: give us
your research program on SARS-like viruses. And you know what
they did? They released the cover page and redacted 290 pages.
They gave us a cover page and 290 blank pages! That's NIH, for
heaven's sake. That's not some corporation. That is the U.S.
government charged with keeping us healthy.
What I found is that we have a lot of data which we're not finding
right now. And I don't want to have to rely on FOIA and leaks,
though those can be incredibly informative. I want clear, independent
scientific investigation and transparency. One way to do this would
be a bipartisan congressional oversight investigation that had
subpoena power. Give us your lab records, your notebooks, your
data files of virus strains, and so forth. There are many questions
that we need independent scientists to define, to tell us exactly
the kinds of information. But we know right now we're operating
in an environment in which the government is working to hide the
data that we need to make a real assessment."
Do NOT comply.