President of CLINTEL says 'There is No Climate Emergency'

Source: (https://bit.ly/3WdSW48)
CLINTEL is an independent foundation that aims to communicate
objectively and transparently to the general public what facts are
available about climate change and climate policy and also where
facts turn into assumptions and predictions.
Over the past few decades the public has been flooded with
fear-mongering stories warning them that global temperatures will
rise to catastrophically high levels.
Climate alarmists have deliberately caused panic demanding we
"must act now" because "time is running out"
They claim that the cause of the impending doom is the increasing
amount of CO2 produced by human activities. The solution, they say,
is the "net zero" emmission policy.
Expose-news reports: Thousands of scientists disagree. As of
1 October 2022, more than 1,400 scientists from around the world
have signed the 'World Climate Declaration' which begins: "Climate
science should be less political, while climate policies should be
more scientific."
CLINTEL has called for an open scientific debate, but the World
Economic Forum, for example, chooses to ignore climate science
and follow climate politics with its catastrophically damaging
"net zero" ideology.
As well as CLINTEL's founder and president, Guus Berkhout
is a professor emeritus of geophysics and a member of the Royal
Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW). In his message
to the world below Berkhout explained why is there such a big
difference between the scaring climate activists' narrative and the
optimistic climate scientists' message who believe there is no
climate emergency.
In the past decades, the public has been flooded with
fear-mongering stories, telling them that global temperatures will
rise to catastrophically high levels.
Climate activists claim that the cause of all this impending doom
is the increasing amount of CO2 produced by human activities. The
proposed solution is the so-called net-zero emission policy, aimed
at lowering human net CO2 emissions to the levels of the
pre-industrial era of the late 1700s.
Those activists also claim that people should panic, and that time
is running out: "Be aware that it is five minutes to midnight, we
must act without delay!" Many thousands of scientists disagree;
more than 1400 are CLINTEL signatories.
In his numerous "last warning" speeches, Antonio Guterres refers
to computer simulations, not the real world. Greta Thunberg testified
to the US Congress that there was "no science" behind her "panic"
comment. This information cannot be found in the media.
So why is there such a big difference between the scaring climate
activists' narrative and the optimistic climate scientists' message,
who believe there is no climate emergency? Please, before you
continue reading, watch our message 'Consensus meet CLINTEL':
Not many citizens are aware that all the frightening climate
predictions have been generated by computer models. And we know
from experience in many other complex areas, how misleading
computer models can be.
For example, think of the many wrong predictions by economic
models or think of the large mistakes in recent pandemic modelling.
The output of computer models depends fully on the assumptions
that modelmakers put into them. In the past 50 years, the predictions
of climate models about global warming and their dire effects have
all been wrong. In the engineering community, they would be
qualified as useless.