That's better :D The reason I sided with Funkanic wasn't for
   atheism (I'm neither atheist nor theist; I'm a bit of both, a
   bit of neither; they're both kind of irrelevant for me
   personally - I'm not trying to speak for everybody) - but I had
   to agree with his initial claims of passive-aggression. The
   reason why I know passive-aggressive so well?* It's because I'VE
   been called on it.* And I was honestly shocked because I didn't
   even realize I was doing it.* Happened a few months ago,
   elsewhere online but it was a good reminder to be honest in what
   I think and what I feel when communicating, as best I can. I
   can't speak for the points you've brought up; You might well be
   right; the video might have nothing to do with religion, and
   Funkanic's comment might have been unnecessary or even
   compatitive for all of the reasons you've stated.* Or perhaps
   not* Or perhaps something inbetween. But now, at least, you've
   given substance that can be debated; challenged; agreed;
   accepted; rejected; fought, won, lost; picked apart, coallated
   and stapled. For that, I want to say "Thanks!" and that's not
   being sarcastic.* I believe fully in freedom of expression and
   you've expressed yourself freely in your last comment.* I wish I
   could say something more specific about it but honestly, I don't
   remember the contents of the video (it's been a while since I
   saw it) :P