Yes; to me, that's the beauty of it; the subjectivity.* I
   believe it is possible to share "working assumptions" of
   absolute truth, recognizing the subjective nature of it, the
   changeability of it, the... "perspectiveness" of it. It's a
   belief of mine that it's possible to have subjective and
   objective simultaneously; in fact, that's one of the beautiful
   things about the scientific method in principle (although not
   always in practice): there are no facts in science that don't
   have the potential to be overturned.* They're taught as
   absolutes, but scientists know them as working-assumptions; the
   'state of the art" - best they have at the time. I don't agree
   with all of the scientific method; I believe it has built-in
   limitations that will make it very difficult to measure the
   subjective from a subjective perspective and consider it
   science; But I think at some point, it may have to; not in my
   lifetime; there's plenty of objectifiable answers to be had.*
   But imagine a day where all potential objective things are
   answered adequately by the scientific method; then what's left
   are all of the questions it could never answer; at some point,
   for a system to be a complete knowledge system, it'll have to
   tackle such things as subjective from a subjective point of
   view; currently not possible in that system. We may not
   currently be able to experience the environment of an author for
   example - with our whole bodies; yet our minds do experience
   perceived environments through imagination; that's why movies
   work so well and why we feel what they feel. It harkens to the
   question of reality; if you experience something, does it make
   it real?* If the experience is shared and verifiable in some
   fashion, does that make it real? Is a shared reality, reality?
   Other examples: What if you could experience the perspectives of
   all people who ever lived, past present and future, all in a
   single moment? We can say, "can't be done". Yet, that's our
   limited technology talking.* Our perspective in our place, at
   this time in history. But - we can do it in our imagination; we
   can imagine experiencing the lifetimes of billions of people
   simultaneously, seeing all that they see, all simultaneously for
   a moment.* Our brain patterns will light up as if it is true.
   So, flash forward to a time when technology is advance; imagine
   we have control of Time and gain the ability to give someone the
   expeirence of every lifetime and their perspectives
   simultaneously? Then... it becomes "yes, it can be done." Where
   is the difference between what happens in the mind verses what
   we experience with our senses?* The line can be easily blurred
   to "none" with virtual reality. My point is this: perhaps all
   things can be true from a particular viewpoint or another and
   the difference between "true" and 'false" has more to do with
   our shared experience rather than as things that are absolute
   for all time. Scientific facts may be true in this point in
   history; we live in particular time; mathematics seems to line
   up well with physics, and physics with mathematics.* Events are
   repeatable.* But what if, one day they're not? Imagine the
   fabric of spacetime changing around us; and we lose our ability
   to predict the future using the current set of physics; and we
   cannot find a new pattern to follow. Then all things return to
   subjective. Did we ever leave subjective? I'm not trying to take
   away from the usefulness of an objective point of view; it gives
   us the ability to have knowledge build upon knowledge build upon
   knowledge in our current civilization.* I would never want it to
   go away, honestly; I like predictability of certain things. I
   know I'm speaking "pie in the sky" as it were; but I think it's
   important to understand the limitations we impose upon what we
   consider "true"; to know where the boundaries are... and see if
   there are ways to get past them until we find the next set of
   boundaries.* If we don't, we may find ourselves trapped as a
   species with limited ways of thinking and not even realize it.
   But truth be told, so to speak, I agree with everything you
   say.* I believe you are 100% right.