Well, actually it wasn't Galileo vs the Inquisition; that's a popular myth. Alfred North Whitehead:* "the worst that happened to the men of science was that Galileo suffered an honorable detention and a mild reproof." Sometimes the Spanish Inquisition, the Protestant Witch Trials in New England and Galileo's incident get mixed up.* They were quite different. The Evolution vs Creationist; I'm actually surprised it's still going on in some Christian circles.* Mainstream Christian churches don't have a problem with Evolution at all... but some strange Christian groups (the Christian equivillants of "junk science") have weird ideas. I don't see a fundamental problem between religions and sciences;some people make a big deal of it, but the whole argument seems very 19th century - the Conflict Thesis has been disregarded by Historians for a long time now, the monkey trial in the 20s was a bit of American silliness anyway. I believe the sciences hold our best hope for progress as a species, as long as there are checks and balances in place to keep excessive political / financial influence from skewing subjects of hypothesis and such.* Plus I believe education in skepticism is beneficial; I'm a fan of skepticism, even towards itself, because any ideology that becomes too powerful can end up going too far.* We haven't had a Country that has a Scientific founding just yet; but should that day come when a scientific ideology rules a kingdom somewhere, and another kingdom rises that also has a scientific ideology... then you'll start to see wars over differing sciences. In other words, I hope Science doesn't delve too far into politics or the military or it could become just like any other political or military organization... pacificism within Science is very important - keeping it as acadmic as possible to keep its hands as clean as possible from changes affecting society.* Whisper in the ear of the politicians and in the courtrooms and in the war-rooms but not take over.