Well i don't know if QM ignores it or not, and I can't speak of
   the Big Bang (I wasn't there - "God said" or "oops it happened"
   or "higher dimensional Bulk with Branes that briefly made
   contact" - I haven't the foggiest idea which one is right so I
   don't try really. although I do have some ideas regarding + and
   - charges, 720 degree electron spin and "how time began" but in
   the end, it'll just be yet another theory if I decide to pursue
   it further. ... anyway As far as the Einstein/Bose condensate,
   while I don't know how it relates to the other things, I will
   say this: I agree that empirical things are generally superior
   ventures for the sciences to investigate - as sometimes the
   theoretical mixes with science-fiction and adherents often have
   a religious fervor about their favorites. At least with
   something like the condensate, it's basically chemistry; and of
   all the sciences, chemistry has a "Look, see?" quality to it
   that has nothing to do with our "ideas" but are tangible,
   touchable, smellable, etc. Literally: Sensible.* [senses]