And yes.* I could have said the whole thing in a short, single sentence.* There's absolutely nothing "new" here, really.* Yet it took a surprising amount of research to come up with simple conclusions.* For example, at one point I studied "Who figured out the best way to solve a Rubiks Cube in the shortest amount of time?"* Well, I found out one of the fastest methods, when it came down to it, was simply this: Mentally chop the thing in half diagonally.* Solve one diag.* Solve the other diag.* One of the fastest (I think it ended up being "the fastest") and there are some yippity-yap and awards and such for the guy but when I realized all he did was chop it in half long-ways... making two triangles (pyramids as it were)... I was like, "ok, duh, makes sense".* Not that I could do it; but it that's what it ended up being. Lots of complicated problems with elaborate descriptions for their solutions ended up working out to: break it down in to parts you can manage, and solve the parts you can manage to solve until you're done. Substitution is another great solution to problems.* Have a stand-in.* If you're getting bullied, a strong friend can take your place.* If you don't know something, learn from someone smarter; they are a "stand-in" for your brain until you understand it and then it gets incorporated into your brain.* If you dont want to understand something and just "get it done", you can pay someone to do something for you. etc etc. So there's a surprising amount of "stuff" behind my ridiculously simple way of explaining what's "obvious".* So many notes I took about different subjected, and ended up pointing to the same answers over and over again.* It was actually kind of annoying; I wanted it to be so much harder or more amazing.* But it wasn't. Maybe that's my limitation; but I can only do as much as I can do.* Someone smarter or better spoken than me can come up with something that sounds better.* I just wanted to "go super basic".* You can accomplish a lot with a few very basic rules, applied thoroughly.