William Mins [tangentially, this is why the pure anarchistic un-governed free-market of goods, ideas, services, and arbitration. is a short-lived dream... within a generation or two the economy, market, and participants adapts, learns, and decides on some rule of order -- a culture is formed, and the behaviors are either sanctioned or punished depending on the mutual consent of all interested and empowered parties. Over time this results in a codified process, and some trusted agency of protective and managerial specialization. Those who refuse to play by the socially acceptable rules, are expected to refrain from playing... or are somehow shunned, repudiated, or penalized for known repeat offences.] Me: Beautifully written my friend.* I'd like to frame your last paragraph, particularly, in gold.* Allow me to relate economics, anarchy and culture, to reading, education, anarchy and culture. I think you read my post on "Reading Comprehension" (ok, my rant), so I'll be a good boy and not repeat it here. My Don Quixote-ness around education seems to be centered around a bit of BS I couldn't explain back in 4th/5th grade, except that it was BS: "What is the Author's Intent?" My first exposure to BS was around 3rd Grade, when I started noticing TV commercials would try to "lead me" and get me excited; and I started seeing them as pieces of stupid plastic or stuffing.* Not that I didn't *want* a lot of it; I did!* But I could "feel the pull" and didn't like that feeling. I didn't like the social pull in school; the attempts to get me to think a certain way because, "everybody else was... "* I was watching Mork & Mindy; I was weird and proud of it.* I was DERP before DERP was a word. But then.. it started showing up in tests.* Right and wrong answers about what's happening in the author's mind.* Right and wrong answers about how *I'm supposed to interpret* them.* My freedom; reading; thinking creatively; coming to my own conclusions; codified, measured, marked and judged. Nowadays, I'd reword "What is the Author's Intent?"* I'd say: *"What are our cultural expectations that we wish for you to infer about the intentions of this author that is not present in the text as written by the author?"* "This is what you should think the author was thinking" seemed wrong then and still does. Writing is playful to me.* Reading is playful to me.* It's not a game of winning and losing.* There is no goal but the thing itself. But.. that's anarchistic.* And... as you beautifully said, within a generation or two, it gets codified.* Those who do not conform are ostracized in some way. *sigh** At least I feel better knowing I wasn't entirely baseless all of these years in seeing something wrong with it.