* [1]http://phys.org/news/2011-04-scientists-spacetime-dimension.html
       enneth Udut I've had similar thoughts to this through the
       years. I remember when this came out and it made sense as a
       possibilities; I always thought of Time as physical, since
       learning about Einstein stuff as a kid.. like we're falling
       down a hole that we can't see and we experience it as Time,
       kinda like Gravity.

       What made it click for me - I think it was 5th or 6th grade
       (I was way into Doctor Who... still am) - is when I learned
       about the illusion of colors; and how Infrared is a color
       that our bodies experience as "Heat", so it seemed logical
       that many of the things we perceive as distinct may not be
       distinct at all.

       But these days, I ALSO have a flip-side notion; much of the
       mathematics describing the Universe do not have a Time
       element; Time is assumed as a measure of change but has no
       steady clock-like element, except perhaps in astrophysics,
       with the whole red-shift, blue-shift, using far off objects
       as measuring sticks..

       and part of me wonders if it's possible that time does exist
       but as most of our calculations already don't measure Time
       and they work perfectly fine, the temptation to eliminate
       time altogether is not such a far stretch of the
       mathematical imagination.

       Not to say they're not right; they just might be; my mind
       goes either way on it, or something entirely different. But
       it's a fun place for the imagination to go and who knows?
       The more ways we look at this elephant, the more we will
       discover in the process, so I see no reason to *not* pursue
       it. There's plenty of room in theory to pursue lots of great
       ideas; and not get trapped into thinking what's only popular
       for today.
       [2]2 mins * [3]Edited * [4]Like
     * [5][IMG]
       [6]Kenneth Udut The real test to me, would be Chemistry.
       Chemistry is the one branch of science that is *entirely*
       dependent upon Time. It is also the field that has the LEAST
       amount of Theory and the _most_ amount of practical, useful,
       daily knowledge. It's not as cool as theoretical physics..
       but it does appear to be time dependent... so any further
       studies in this theory, I think, might be testable in the
       lab, thorugh chemistry.



References

   Visible links
   1. https://www.facebook.com/kenneth.udut?fref=ufi
   2. https://www.facebook.com/gary.wayne.94695/posts/1517934101816934?comment_id=1518299875113690&offset=0&total_comments=2
   3. Show edit history
	https://www.facebook.com/#
   4. Like this comment
	https://www.facebook.com/#
   5. https://www.facebook.com/kenneth.udut?fref=ufi
   6. https://www.facebook.com/kenneth.udut?fref=ufi