Yes, I've found some answers in Science and some in other areas of inquiry. Some of science's answers I'm dissatisfied with because they rest on some unspoken assumptions, and so I keep researching. For example, at 11 years old, I had a moment where I wondered, 'What if there was no color and only refractions of light and density of things could tell things apart?" [we had just gone over how light works in school] and for a few minutes, it was as if I could see, superimposed on reality, all the colors gone and I was able to imagine seeing through myself, through the earth, able to distinguish the differences between things but not by color or by lines but more like textures I guess. I looked up and could see through the roof while the roof remained and through planets and suns to the end of the universe with sharpness and distinction yet without lines or color, not even white or black. It was a cool experience and, as nutty as it seems, I can recall it and redo it, and the more I learn about "what lies beneath" physical objects - the density and shapes of materials, the more clear it gets. It's part of what keeps everything in life absolutely fascinating to me. One of the things that annoyed me was, "Why can't the electrons just cooperate, line up like two sets of window blinds, and just allow things to pass through each other? That one bugged me for a long time until I learned about the Pauli Exclusion principle, fermions, bosons, charges, and being stuck on variations of the Casimir effect from hundreds of years ago. Then I got annoyed with those things. I *still* think it should be possible, eventually. but I know I won't see it in my lifetime. I just don't like areas where we're asked to accept, "Well, that's just how it is". Oh well they're just some of the things I find interesting. Now, my 9 year old nephew came out bugging me to install mods for Minecraft that he wants to play with me on our LAN, and says I've been typing for too long. But I'll return later