Yes; in my view, if you're a consciousness in another body,
   you're not human any longer. If you're embodied in a computer
   and conscious, you are a conscious computer - if you have always
   been that way.

   But if you were once a conscious human in a society of humans
   and now a conscious computer who was once a human in a society
   of computers (or even in a society of humans), then you'll be
   experiencing quite a lot of cognitive dissonances, as your
   inputs and outputs are remapped to your new capabilities.

   It's why I don't generally buy-in to the computational theory of
   mind, even if utilizing terms used for computers is sometimes
   helpful in analogizing our consciousness to 'something'.

   In the 1940s, we analogized to telephone switchboards.

   If a higher technology comes up, we'll analogize the
   consciousness to that as well.

   Interestingly - I just noticed I fell into the same trap;
   disassociating cnsciousness to being something that can be
   mapped within a computer's circuits. I'm not sure how to use the
   language properly to describe it better though...

   In short, I believe conscousness is a product of the thinking
   processes, the environment the thinking processes itself in (the
   body and the "world outside" as it were), and that which whom
   he/she socializes/has contact with [to compare/contrast one's
   'self' with]