Well, I pointed out odder parts of my thinking processes for similar reasons you mentioned about men and the nail: I know the obvious answers already (that women want to establish a relationship between themselves and the situation they're in with regards to the nail; that's how women seem to tend to work afaik - and that she's not complaining about the pain but rather discussing it, as a stress reliever and as a way of continuing and an opportunity to deepen an established relationship with the partner.. because the nail will be gone eventually but is their relationship what she thinks and does she know him as well as she thinks he does - and stressful situations and the partner's reaction are indicators of the depth of the partner's understanding of their mental/emotional processes - ie "can you read me or are you blind to me?"). How he handles this situation is considered to be indicative of how he handles other situations, not involving nails. I'm not* really saying that men only have a few emotions... even if that's how I worded it.* Rather, the way that women talk about and understand emotions and relationships is a system that is entirely foreign to a good portion of men in the population. There's a nail in her head.* Guy thinks, "Get rid of the nail. Done." There's a nail in her head.* She thinks a lot more thoughts than just the nail. Of course some of it is based on a cultural illusion: that mindreading is even possible by reading clues and signs.* There's a whole science of body language, word cues, response mechanisms within a feminine culture that just... isn't really there in "man world".* Man culture has a more limited expressiveness in this regard. But mindreading isn't possible - not really; yet, determining "intent" or trying to discern, "What did you really mean by that?* There's more than what you said - it's HOW you said it.. " is a huge part of female culture. It's barely there in typical male culture.* This is what I mean by limited emotional stuff with regards to men. Yet it's not emotion vs reason. Reason is pushed by the amygdala - pushed by emotion.* It's not a separated system.* Pure logic and reason in a human results in perpetual indeciveness, as they've found with people with brain damage to the amygdala.* Without the emotional push, you can't make conclusions without GREAT difficulty. See: [1]http://www.edbatista.com/2011/07/antonio-damasio-on-emotion-and-reason.html +[2]strontiumXnitrate +[3]Jack Butler I also know that I have no idea what I'm talking about and that which I do understand is hard to explain.* If this stuff was easy to explain, understand and be understood, I doubt there's be an "it's not about the nail" issue to begin with. Wouldn't it have been solved long ago if it was easy? I'm utilizing stereotypes here.* All women are not this way.* All men are not this way. Perhaps NONE are, and I'm just talking out of my hat.* All valid possibilities. References Visible links 1. http://www.edbatista.com/2011/07/antonio-damasio-on-emotion-and-reason.html 2. https://plus.google.com/110801132222841005414 3. https://plus.google.com/103004626444181748316