Thank you for your analysis and for pointing that out.*
   Intersubjectivity is a word I don't see nearly enough and you're
   right; in the actual practice of science, the lines that seem so
   nice and clear to students are, as always and thankfully so,
   blurred by good ol' reality, at least from what I can see. I've
   made some kind of switching error of some sort in that
   statement.* I have, alas, been hanging around several Philosophy
   forums over the past six months, conquering once and for all, a
   lifetime distaste for that method of discourse... at least.. as
   it manifests itself on the Internet. Ayn Rand anyone? Fallacy?*
   Oh if I hear that word one more time... But you recognize my
   point well.* My beef, in the end, is with Science-as-presented
   and the repercussions in society, rather than its actual
   practice per se.* We're all just people doing the best we can
   with whatever knowledge we have at hand at the time in whatever
   roles we may be playing at the time. I was excessively harsh
   regarding perceptions of the Subject because I find myself
   defending its ... well.. ultimate truthfulness:* not as
   "absolute " or "ideal form"* - but as a series of on-going
   negotiations in shared human attempts towards .. ... well,
   towards whatever it is that supposedly we're all working
   towards. I suppose we're working towards a Utopian ideal of some
   kind.* Well, many Utopias, different depending who you ask.*
   Shared utopian visions can lead to great things while at the
   same time losing some things in the process if care isn't taken.