One thing I like about Wikipedia is that its users will toss in
   unexpected links to other fields.... reminders that a lot of
   these concepts are "signs of the times" (sorry - signs? get it?
   tongue emoticon anyway...) -
   [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narrative_therapy
   and I find, when a subject is _difficult_, go _outside_ of the
   context you're constrained to, see it from another perspective,
   then come back again.

   I'm sure the method I use falls within _one_ of these
   philosophical schools of thought, but I don't know which one.
   After all, I believe I'm a product of the generation I grew up
   in, and all my assumptions were laid out within it, and only
   through deconstructing the assumptions given to me do I have a
   hope of reconstructing a 'me' that's more... authentic.

   So, even though I may be using the same possibly flawed tools to
   analyze possibly flawed tools, nonetheless, it's not a
   mathematical thing. I can go from disbelief to belief, from
   congruity to incongruity back to another congruity anytime I
   wish ... a concept that ALSO is likely paralleled by something
   already bootstrapped in my past.

   But I'm ok with that tongue emoticon Fear of infinite recursion
   is ridiculous, imo.

References

   Visible links
   1. https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FNarrative_therapy&h=oAQFEzs_y