You have a system that works for you. It works for many. It's
   admirable. I, on the other hand, do not. I consider preexisting
   systems of logic to be mazes one must travel through to reach a
   necessarily limiting set of goals.
   But I, the American, get the TNT and blow up the library and
   say, "look at all these pages! Everybody grab a page!"
   So, I believe I understand where you're coming from in your
   characterization of me. It's not invalid. I've also been
   characterized as a "social anarchist" and I can't argue with
   that either. It's valid enough. It's quite likely that I
   represent everything you detest in modern scholarship as it
   stands. I will stand proudly with my armor and fight to defend
   as long as you wish, but you're welcome to a seat at the table.
   I won't poison your food.