t makes sense. I tend towards "embodied cognition" as my model,
   so in my view, we incorporate the very world around us into us
   and construct a reality that hopefully strongly resembles ...
   well.. what's around us. Wait - no no - we don't construct it
   INTO us - rather, we're an intrinsic PART of the very world we
   are constructing. UGH - growing up with dualistic language it's
   HARD to get away from the whole 'IN/OUT"way of tlaking.

   I also see logic as an emotional state utilizing a limited
   number of emotions resulting in a greater speed and it's mostly
   processed in an offset portion of the brain. It's a tertiary
   logic system, in which the bulk of the work is done in somewhat
   of a boolean fashion, with the 3rd being the deciding factor -
   the one that has to deal with the bulk of the other emotional
   states, compress them into a nifty little kernel and use to
   decide "True / False" "Right / "Wrong" "Certain / Uncertain" -
   and dual-type things.