I think you're onto something with that. That's the missing
   piece right there. What was missing from Seedy's logic study was
   one simple thing he missed: He was trying to win.
   Binary. 0, 1. Loser, Winner. All that fancy logic sitting on top
   of a binary win/lose situation. To me, dismantles all of the
   fancy talk entirely.

   Had he understood I was shooting for equivalence, I might have
   hung around. But the binary finish showed that, in the end,
   that's what mattered. I kinda knew it from the start, but seeing
   it showed he missed the point entirely. It's likely why his Guru
   fired him from his... wherever the guru's hang out... in his
   thing. smile emoticon I'm still friends with him; I like the guy
   - but he'll always miss that "something".