Being that this is a computer, it's in a department I'm
   comfortable and familiar with. My experience with human rights
   is mostly limited to a youth rights activist thing I did back in
   1990-1997 on the early Internet - it spawned a few more lobbying
   type groups, but my interest was more freedom of
   expression/creativity/education rather than voting rights,
   parenting rights, etc.

   Anyway - being that it's a computer... there's a lot of people
   involved. This tree illustrates the everyday issues with making
   anything.

   A flaw in any part of the process and you end up with a
   half-assed product. This is the norm rather than the exception;
   problems with robot bomb sniffers were notorously awful in the
   beginning stages. Nobody was listening to anybody.

   Anyway, assuming it makes it to a compromise where everybody is
   happy enough with the product (in this case, a flying computer
   that follows the instructions given to it ahead of time by the
   users, the engineers, the programmers, etc.

   So, is there a human in charge? Yes. There is *many* many humans
   in charge, and they all play a part in making something like
   this work according to plan.

   Or at least try to. The drone they end up with will be
   all-too-human, with all of the flaws programmed fully into it.

   How they will use it? That's the territory you're talking about.