yes, to me is a categories problem. Not the categories
   themselves per se; they can be useful, but rather the 'hard
   lines' put inbetween them. They're useful distinctions; and
   sometimes it's important to emphasize them yet without
   forgetting that the lines between them are rather fictional in
   nature, having more to do with approach (methodologies) and the
   language used because, in the end, if you send 150 different
   disciplines to study something, what do you get in the end of it
   all? What's being studied?