Schema... Philosophy... Writing definitions... You came to mind
   today at work. So did "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle
   Maintenance.* How does one define "quality" as a measurable
   thing? I chose to use the noun definition as in "a quality",
   characteristic, or attribute. The problem is then categorizing
   it uniquely enough by measurable attributes to "define"
   quality-X. Physical, computational, methodology, actors,
   behaviors... Ugh."[1]Kenneth-Udut-schemaCategorization. So many
   ways to draw conceptual lines but making ones that don't have
   overlapping attributes is far trickier** *The "attributes of
   attributes.... " down the rabbit hole we go...*tongue emoticon
   == I think of maps overlapping maps overlapping maps. You never
   get enough qualities to describe "the thing" perfectly but if
   you overlap enough maps, you can get a decent approximation. I
   think you're going to glow brightly in this. You're the right
   person for it. The fascinating part about schema is that it
   becomes law. It'll just be "part of the system" and few will
   question it, if any. That's the nice part about being the pro.
   ==

References

   Visible links
   1. http://icopiedyou.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Kenneth-Udut-schema.jpg