I wouldn't go so far as advocating full anarchy. I believe
   systems _do_ serve their functions for people yet I believe all
   systems that gather and process humans are flawed. I don't
   believe full anarchy is a solution, tempting as it is. I want
   cops. Judges. I want to be able to buy a product made 5000 miles
   away cheaply because of systems in place that allow for things
   to get to me. Where am I gonna get my laptop from where I am?
   Systems like the Internet require cooperation on a very large
   scale. BUT within these flawed systems, some basic civility and
   an allowance for anarchy is necessary imo for a functional
   society. Push and pull. Lots of "leave me alone and I'll leave
   you alone". Cooperation on scales greater than basic civility
   when a group of people want to accomplish a goal. But I put
   civility as primary with force (either from the in to the out or
   the out to the in) as something that should rarely be necessary.
   I took a test once that put me as a "social anarchist". I'd say
   that's more or less true.